CVE-2025-63663
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIncorrect access control in the /api/v1/conversations/*/files API of GT Edge AI Platform before v2.0.10 allows unauthorized attackers to access other users' uploaded files.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe /api/v1/conversations/*/files API endpoint in GT Edge AI Platform versions before v2.0.10 lacks proper authorization validation, allowing any authenticated user to access files from other users' conversations by manipulating the conversation identifier in the URL. This is a classic Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability exposing sensitive user data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.0.12CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify GT Edge AI Platform versionCheck the installed version of GT Edge AI Platform using the platform's admin interface, version lookup command, or the application's /api/v1/health or /version endpointAffected if The installed version is below 2.0.12
-
Verify API endpoint accessibilityConfirm that the /api/v1/conversations/*/files endpoint is accessible in the deployed instance by reviewing API documentation or testing endpoint availability with valid authenticationAffected if The endpoint is exposed and accepts requests
-
Check API authorization logicReview the API endpoint's source code or configuration to verify if conversation ID authorization validation is properly enforced before returning file dataAffected if Authorization validation is missing or inadequate for the conversation file endpoint
If GT Edge AI Platform version is below 2.0.12 and the /api/v1/conversations/*/files endpoint is accessible without proper conversation ownership validation, the environment is affected by this IDOR vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.0.12
Upgrade GT Edge AI Platform to version v2.0.10 or later which implements proper access control validation on the file access API endpoint.
GT Edge AI Platform v2.0.12
- 1. Verify current installation version of GT Edge AI Platform by checking the application or using version lookup commands
- 2. Backup all user data and configuration files before performing the upgrade
- 3. Upgrade GT Edge AI Platform to version 2.0.12 or later
- 4. After upgrade, verify the /api/v1/conversations/*/files API now properly enforces authorization checks
- 5. Confirm that users can only access files within their own conversations
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-63663 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-63663 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data