CVE-2025-63689
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple SQL injection vulnerabilitites in ycf1998 money-pos system before commit 11f276bd20a41f089298d804e43cb1c39d041e59 (2025-09-14) allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the orderby parameter
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMultiple SQL injection vulnerabilities exist in the orderby parameter of the ycf1998 money-pos system. These flaws allow remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution on the underlying database server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2025-09-14CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed version of Ycf1998 Money PosCheck the application version file, about page, or metadata file included with the installation. If using a git repository, run 'git log --oneline -1' to see the latest commit hash.Affected if The version is dated before 2025-09-14 or the commit hash is before 11f276bd20a41f089298d804e43cb1c39d041e59
-
Locate the source code handling the orderby parameterSearch the codebase for endpoints or functions that accept an 'orderby' or 'order_by' parameter, particularly in list, search, or query functions. Review the controller or model files that process this parameter.Affected if The code directly uses the orderby parameter value in SQL queries without sanitization or parameterized queries
-
Examine database query construction for the orderby parameterReview the SQL query logic where orderby is used. Look for string concatenation or string formatting that inserts the orderby value directly into the query. Check if the code uses prepared statements or parameter binding.Affected if The orderby parameter is concatenated directly into SQL strings rather than being passed as a bound parameter
-
Check if the application uses an exposed API endpoint with orderbyIdentify any REST endpoints, AJAX handlers, or web routes that accept an orderby query parameter. Test if these endpoints pass the parameter to the database layer without validation.Affected if The application exposes an endpoint that accepts user-supplied orderby values and forwards them to the database query
You are affected if the Ycf1998 Money Pos version is before 2025-09-14 (or commit before 11f276bd20a41f089298d804e43cb1c39d041e59) and the codebase contains code paths where the orderby parameter flows directly into SQL queries without sanitization or parameterized binding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2025-09-14
Update to commit 11f276bd20a41f089298d804e43cb1c39d041e59 (2025-09-14) or later. If unable to update immediately, disable the affected orderby parameter or implement input validation/parameterized queries as an interim measure.
Upgrade to version at or after commit 11f276bd20a41f089298d804e43cb1c39d041e59 (2025-09-14 or later)
- 1. Locate the ycf1998 money-pos application in your environment
- 2. Identify the current version or commit hash in use
- 3. If using a version before 2025-09-14, update to a version at or after commit 11f276bd20a41f089298d804e43cb1c39d041e59
- 4. Verify the update was successful by checking the application version or commit
- 5. Test the application functionality, particularly any features using the orderby parameter
- 6. Confirm the SQL injection vulnerability is resolved by validating that orderby parameter input is properly parameterized
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-63689 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-63689 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data