CVE-2025-63705
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNPM package node-ts-ocr 1.0.15 is vulnerable to OS Command Injection via the invokeImageOcr function in src/index.js.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe node-ts-ocr NPM package version 1.0.15 is vulnerable to OS Command Injection via the invokeImageOcr function in src/index.js. This allows attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by supplying specially crafted input to this function.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if node-ts-ocr is installedRun 'npm list node-ts-ocr' or inspect package.json dependencies to see if node-ts-ocr is listed as a dependencyAffected if node-ts-ocr appears in dependencies with version 1.0.15 or an unpatched version
-
Verify the installed versionRun 'npm list node-ts-ocr' to display the exact installed version number, or check the version field in node_modules/node-ts-ocr/package.jsonAffected if The installed version is 1.0.15 or falls within any unpatched version range that retains the vulnerable invokeImageOcr function
-
Inspect the vulnerable function sourceExamine node_modules/node-ts-ocr/src/index.js and locate the invokeImageOcr function to confirm it uses unsafe command invocation (such as exec, spawn, or similar shell execution methods without proper sanitization)Affected if The invokeImageOcr function in src/index.js directly passes user input to shell execution APIs without parameterized commands or input validation
-
Check for usage of invokeImageOcr in your codeSearch your codebase for any calls to invokeImageOcr (for example, using grep or IDE search: 'invokeImageOcr') and review how user-controlled data flows into this functionAffected if Your application calls invokeImageOcr and passes unsanitized external input to it
You are affected if node-ts-ocr version 1.0.15 (or an unpatched version) is installed and your code uses the invokeImageOcr function with unsanitized input that could be interpreted as shell commands.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a patched version of node-ts-ocr if available, or refactor invokeImageOcr to use parameterized execution methods instead of shell command invocation, with strict input validation.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-63705 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-63705 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data