CVE-2025-63939
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper input handling in /Grocery/search_products_itname.php, in anirudhkannan Grocery Store Management System 1.0, allows SQL injection via the sitem_name POST parameter.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the search_products_itname.php script allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through the unsanitized sitem_name POST parameter. The application directly incorporates user input into SQL queries without using parameterized queries or input validation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the vulnerable scriptSearch the web application directory for the file search_products_itname.php. Use file system search commands (e.g., find, ls, or equivalent) to locate this PHP script in the web root or application directories.Affected if The file search_products_itname.php exists in the application and is accessible via the web server.
-
Identify parameter usage in the scriptOpen search_products_itname.php and locate where the sitem_name POST parameter is received (e.g., $_POST['sitem_name']). Verify that this parameter is used in SQL query construction.Affected if The script receives $_POST['sitem_name'] and incorporates it directly into a SQL query string.
-
Check for absence of prepared statementsReview the SQL query code in search_products_itname.php. Look for whether the query uses prepare() with placeholders (?) or bindParam()/bindValue(), or whether it concatenates the sitem_name variable directly into the query string.Affected if The sitem_name parameter is concatenated or interpolated directly into the SQL query string without using parameterized queries.
-
Test parameter injection externallySend a crafted POST request to search_products_itname.php with a test payload in the sitem_name parameter (e.g., sitem_name=' OR '1'='1). Monitor the application response and database error messages.Affected if The application returns database errors exposing SQL syntax or exhibits unexpected behavior indicating SQL injection is possible.
-
Review database query logsExamine database logs or web application firewall (WAF) logs for suspicious patterns in sitem_name parameter values, such as SQL keywords (UNION, SELECT, INSERT) or syntax characters (', ;, --).Affected if Logs show SQL injection attempts against the sitem_name parameter, or unusual SQL syntax in logged queries.
The environment is affected if the search_products_itname.php script exists, processes the sitem_name POST parameter, and uses direct string concatenation in SQL queries instead of parameterized queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL query construction with prepared statements/parameterized queries for the sitem_name parameter, implement strict input validation, and apply principle of least privilege to database accounts.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-63939 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-63939 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data