CVE-2025-64063
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedPrimakon Pi Portal 1.0.18 API endpoints fail to enforce sufficient authorization checks when processing requests. Specifically, a standard user can exploit this flaw by sending direct HTTP requests to administrative endpoints, bypassing the UI restrictions. This allows the attacker to manipulate data outside their assigned scope, including: Unauthorized Account modification, modifying/deleting arbitrary user accounts and changing passwords by sending a direct request to the user management API endpoint; Confidential Data Access, accessing and downloading sensitive organizational documents via a direct request to the document retrieval API; Privilege escalation, This vulnerability can lead to complete compromise of data integrity and confidentiality, and Privilege Escalation by manipulating core system functions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencePrimakon Pi Portal 1.0.18 contains API endpoints with broken access control that fail to enforce authorization checks. Authenticated standard users can bypass UI restrictions by sending direct HTTP requests to administrative API endpoints, enabling unauthorized account modification, arbitrary user deletion, password changes, and access to sensitive organizational documents.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0.18CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify the installed version of Primakon Project Contract ManagementLocate the application installation directory or check the software inventory/system information to identify the exact version number of Primakon Project Contract ManagementAffected if The installed version is exactly 1.0.18 (this specific version is affected)
-
Identify if API endpoints are accessibleReview the application's API documentation or examine network traffic to identify exposed API endpoints, particularly those related to user management, account operations, and administrative functionsAffected if API endpoints exist and accept HTTP requests without requiring authentication or role validation
-
Confirm user role separation existsCheck if the application implements role-based access control with distinct standard user and administrator rolesAffected if Multiple user roles exist but the application relies only on UI-side restrictions rather than server-side authorization enforcement
-
Test API access from a standard user accountUsing a non-administrative account, send direct HTTP requests to administrative endpoints (such as user modification, account deletion, or password change endpoints) to verify if authorization is enforced server-sideAffected if A standard user account can successfully access or execute administrative operations via direct API calls despite not having UI access to those features
You are affected if Primakon Project Contract Management version 1.0.18 is installed and API endpoints can be accessed or manipulated by standard users without proper server-side authorization validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement role-based access control (RBAC) and proper authorization validation on all API endpoints to verify user permissions before allowing administrative actions, document access, or account modifications.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-64063 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-64063 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data