Race ConditionWeakness · CWE-362

CVE-2025-64168

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-10-31
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
77/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Agno is a multi-agent framework, runtime and control plane. From 2.0.0 to before 2.2.2, under high concurrency, when session_state is passed to Agent or Team during run or arun calls, a race condition can occur, causing a session_state to be assigned and persisted to the incorrect session. This may result in user data from one session being exposed to another user. This has been patched in version 2.2.2.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A race condition in the Agno multi-agent framework (versions 2.0.0 to 2.2.1) causes session_state to be incorrectly assigned across sessions during concurrent Agent or Team run/arun calls. Under high concurrency, session data from one user can be exposed to another user due to improper session state management.

MitigationUpgrade to Agno version 2.2.2 or later to patch the race condition. Until upgraded, avoid high-concurrency scenarios or implement application-level session isolation as a temporary workaround.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed Agno version
    Run `pip show agno` or `pip list | grep -i agno` to identify the installed version number
    Affected if Version is 2.0.0, 2.0.1, 2.0.2, 2.0.3, 2.0.4, 2.0.5, 2.1.0, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3, 2.1.4, 2.2.0, or 2.2.1
  2. Identify concurrent Agent.run or Team.run usage
    Search your codebase for patterns where agent.run(), agent.arun(), team.run(), or team.arun() are called concurrently (within async functions, ThreadPoolExecutor, multiprocessing, or loop structures)
    Affected if Multiple Agent or Team run/arun calls execute simultaneously and share session_state
  3. Inspect session_state for sensitive data
    Review code where session_state is populated or accessed; check if it contains user credentials, tokens, PII, or other sensitive information that should not cross sessions
    Affected if session_state holds user-specific sensitive data and is used in concurrent contexts
  4. Check for multi-user or high-concurrency deployment
    Examine your deployment to determine if multiple users or high request volumes trigger concurrent agent executions (check web server logs, load balancer configs, or application metrics for concurrent request patterns)
    Affected if Your application serves multiple users or handles high-concurrency requests using Agno agents

You are likely affected if running Agno 2.0.0-2.2.1 with concurrent Agent/Team run/arun calls where session_state contains user-specific data.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to Agno version 2.2.2 or later to patch the race condition. Until upgraded, avoid high-concurrency scenarios or implement application-level session isolation as a temporary workaround.

Recommended fix High confidence

2.2.2 or later

  1. Check current installed version of agno (pip show agno or pip list | grep agno)
  2. Upgrade to version 2.2.2 or later using: pip install --upgrade agno>=2.2.2
  3. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the installed version

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing5.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,790
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,464.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-64168 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-64168 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data