CVE-2025-64280
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA SQL Injection Vulnerability in CentralSquare Community Development 19.5.7 allows attackers to inject SQL via the permit_no field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA SQL injection vulnerability exists in CentralSquare Community Development version 19.5.7, specifically in the permit_no field. Attackers can inject malicious SQL commands through this input, potentially allowing unauthorized database access, data exfiltration, or complete system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 19.5.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm CentralSquare Community Development versionLocate the installed version of CentralSquare Community Development by checking the application metadata, About page, or system information panel within the software. If accessible via command line, use the vendor-provided version query command.Affected if The installed version is exactly 19.5.7
-
Verify permit_no field is accessibleIdentify whether the permit_no input field is exposed in the Community Development web interface, typically found in permit search, permit lookup, or building permit inquiry functions.Affected if The permit_no field is available and accepts user input in any public or authenticated portal
-
Check for direct SQL execution on permit_noReview application logs, database query logs, or web application firewall (WAF) logs for the permit_no parameter to determine if raw SQL concatenation is occurring rather than parameterized queries.Affected if SQL queries involving permit_no are being constructed through string concatenation or direct interpolation without prepared statements
-
Inspect application database configurationExamine the application configuration files or source code for database connection settings and SQL query handling related to permit operations. Look for query patterns that directly embed the permit_no parameter.Affected if The application uses dynamic SQL construction where permit_no input is inserted directly into query strings
A user is affected if they are running CentralSquare Community Development version 19.5.7 and the permit_no field is exposed and processed through non-parameterized SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRemediate by implementing parameterized queries or prepared statements for all database operations involving the permit_no field, combined with strict input validation. Apply vendor-supplied patches immediately as this critical (CVSS 9.8) vulnerability is likely being actively targeted.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,512.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-64280 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-64280 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data