CVE-2025-64293
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Golemiq 0 Day Analytics 0-day-analytics allows SQL Injection.This issue affects 0 Day Analytics: from n/a through <= 4.0.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL Injection vulnerability in Golemiq 0 Day Analytics product (versions up to 4.0.0) allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through improper neutralization of special elements in SQL queries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Golemiq 0 Day Analytics installationSearch for the application in your system using standard software inventory tools, package managers, or file system searches for 'Golemiq' or '0 Day Analytics' directories and executablesAffected if The application is found and installed on the system
-
Determine installed versionCheck the application's version information through its main executable, about dialog, version file, or installation metadata. Compare the version number against the affected range (4.0.0 and below)Affected if The installed version is 4.0.0 or lower, indicating the vulnerable version range
-
Identify database query functionalityLocate and inspect the application's database interaction code, configuration files, and modules that handle SQL queries. Look for files that import or use SQL query construction methodsAffected if The application uses direct SQL query construction and has database connectivity features enabled
-
Check for non-parameterized query usageReview the application source code and database modules for raw SQL query strings that incorporate user-supplied input directly without using parameterized queries, prepared statements, or input sanitizationAffected if SQL queries are constructed by concatenating or interpolating user input directly into query strings without parameter binding
-
Assess exposure of user input to database layerIdentify application endpoints, forms, or APIs that accept user input and pass it to database operations. Determine if these inputs flow through the vulnerable SQL query construction pathsAffected if User-provided input can reach the SQL query construction code identified in step 4
A user is affected if Golemiq 0 Day Analytics is installed with version 4.0.0 or lower and the application processes user input through direct SQL query construction without parameterized queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patch when available; until then, implement parameterized queries and input validation as compensating controls.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-64293 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-64293 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data