Missing AuthenticationWeakness · CWE-306

CVE-2025-64307

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-11-15
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
70/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Brightpick Internal Logic Control web interface is accessible without requiring user authentication. An unauthorized user could exploit this interface to manipulate robot control functions, including initiating or halting runners, assigning jobs, clearing stations, and deploying storage totes.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Brightpick Internal Logic Control web interface lacks authentication, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to access robot control functions including initiating/halting runners, assigning jobs, clearing stations, and deploying storage totes.

MitigationImplement authentication and role-based access control on the Internal Logic Control web interface to ensure only authorized personnel can access robot control functions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Brightpick Internal Logic Control web interface exposure
    Scan your network for web services running on the Brightpick system. Look for the Internal Logic Control web interface - typically accessible via HTTP/HTTPS on the automation controller or robot management network segment.
    Affected if The Internal Logic Control web interface is exposed and accessible on the network without VPN or network segmentation protection.
  2. Check if authentication is required for the web interface
    Attempt to access the Internal Logic Control web interface URL without providing any credentials. Observe whether the system redirects to a login page, returns an authentication error, or allows access to the control panel.
    Affected if The interface loads or presents control functions without requiring any username, password, or other authentication credentials.
  3. Verify robot control functions are accessible without authentication
    Navigate through the web interface menu to locate robot control functions: initiating/halting runners, assigning jobs, clearing stations, and deploying storage totes. Attempt to access these functions without logging in.
    Affected if Robot control functions (runner start/stop, job assignment, station clearing, tote deployment) are visible and accessible without any authenticated session.
  4. Test for unauthenticated command execution capability
    If accessible, examine whether API endpoints or action buttons for robot control are functional without an authenticated session. Check for HTTP responses that indicate successful command submission rather than authentication errors.
    Affected if Commands to control robots (start, halt, assign jobs) can be submitted and executed without any authentication token or session.

Your environment is affected if the Brightpick Internal Logic Control web interface is accessible and allows access to robot control functions without requiring authentication credentials.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement authentication and role-based access control on the Internal Logic Control web interface to ensure only authorized personnel can access robot control functions.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
36.0 hours of engineering $6,400
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-64307 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-64307 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data