Agentforce VibesApplication · Salesforce

CVE-2025-64320

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-11-04
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.2.0 or later.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Neutralization of Input Used for LLM Prompting vulnerability in Salesforce Agentforce Vibes Extension allows Code Injection.This issue affects Agentforce Vibes Extension: before 3.2.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Improper neutralization of input in Salesforce Agentforce Vibes Extension allows code injection via LLM prompting. The extension fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input before incorporating it into LLM prompts, enabling attackers to inject malicious prompt content that could result in unauthorized code execution.

MitigationUpgrade Agentforce Vibes Extension to version 3.2.0 or later to remediate the vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Agentforce VibesApplication
Affected:< 3.2.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Agentforce Vibes Extension version
    Locate the installed version of the Salesforce Agentforce Vibes Extension in your Salesforce setup. This is typically found in the extension settings, package manager, or installed apps section of your Salesforce org.
    Affected if The installed version is lower than 3.2.0
  2. Verify extension is enabled
    Confirm that the Agentforce Vibes Extension is actively enabled in your Salesforce environment. Check the extension status in your Salesforce setup or administration console.
    Affected if The extension is enabled and running
  3. Check for LLM prompt functionality
    Identify if the Agentforce Vibes Extension is configured to use LLM prompting capabilities. Review the extension feature settings and configuration options related to prompt generation or AI interactions.
    Affected if LLM prompting features are configured and in use
  4. Review user input handling in prompts
    Examine how user-supplied input flows through the Agentforce Vibes Extension to LLM prompts. Check for any custom configurations or integrations that pass user data to the extension without sanitization.
    Affected if User input can be incorporated into LLM prompts directly without input validation

If Agentforce Vibes Extension version is below 3.2.0 and LLM prompting is enabled with user input flowing to prompts, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.2.0 or later
Fixed in 3.2.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Agentforce Vibes Extension to version 3.2.0 or later to remediate the vulnerability.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

3.2.0

  1. Identify the current version of Agentforce Vibes Extension installed in your Salesforce org
  2. Review current Agentforce Vibes Extension configurations and prompt templates for any customizations
  3. Back up current Agentforce Vibes Extension configuration data
  4. Navigate to the Salesforce AppExchange or Salesforce setup to obtain Agentforce Vibes Extension version 3.2.0 or later
  5. Upgrade the Agentforce Vibes Extension to version 3.2.0 or latest available version
  6. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the installed package version
  7. Test Agentforce Vibes Extension functionality to ensure the code injection vulnerability is remediated

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Agentforce Vibes Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,390
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-64320 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-64320 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data