CVE-2025-64428
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDataease is an open source data visualization analysis tool. Versions prior to 2.10.17 are vulnerable to JNDI injection. A blacklist was added in the patch for version 2.10.14. However, JNDI injection remains possible via the iiop, corbaname, and iiopname schemes. The vulnerability has been fixed in version 2.10.17.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceDataease versions prior to 2.10.17 contain a JNDI injection vulnerability. While a blacklist was added in version 2.10.14 to block certain JNDI lookup schemes, attackers can bypass this by using alternative schemes such as iiop, corbaname, or iiopname to trigger malicious JNDI lookups leading to remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.10.17CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Dataease installationLocate the Dataease application - common methods include checking running Docker containers (docker ps), looking for the Dataease service process, or checking its installation directoryAffected if Dataease is installed on the system
-
Determine installed Dataease versionCheck the version of the Dataease installation - this can typically be found in the Docker image tag, the application startup logs, the About page in the web UI, or the installation metadataAffected if The version cannot be determined or is visible
-
Compare version to affected rangeCompare the identified version against the affected range: any version prior to 2.10.17 is vulnerableAffected if The installed version is lower than 2.10.17 (for example, 2.10.16, 2.10.10, 2.9.0, etc.)
The environment is affected if Dataease is installed and the running version is any version prior to 2.10.17.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.10.17
Upgrade Dataease to version 2.10.17 or later to apply the complete fix for the JNDI injection vulnerability.
2.10.17
- Confirm current Dataease version by checking the installed instance
- Stop the Dataease service
- Back up the existing Dataease installation and database
- Upgrade to Dataease version 2.10.17 or later
- Start the Dataease service
- Verify the upgrade was successful and the service is running
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-64428 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-64428 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data