CVE-2025-64444
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection') issue exists in NCP-HG100 1.4.48.16 and earlier. If exploited, a remote attacker who has obtained the authentication information to log in to the management page of the product may execute an arbitrary OS command with root privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOS Command Injection vulnerability in NCP-HG100 management interface (versions 1.4.48.16 and earlier). An authenticated remote attacker can inject arbitrary OS commands through the management page that execute with root privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm NCP-HG100 device identityIdentify the device model through web interface, device label, or SNMP inventory. Look for 'NCP-HG100' or 'HG100' in product documentation, management console, or network discovery results.Affected if The device is not an NCP-HG100 unit
-
Check firmware version against affected rangeAccess the device management interface (typically via web browser on the management IP). Navigate to the version or status page to retrieve the installed firmware/software version number. Compare this version to 1.4.48.16 using semantic version comparison.Affected if The installed version is 1.4.48.16 or earlier, or if the version cannot be determined but the device is confirmed as NCP-HG100 with legacy firmware
-
Verify management interface accessibilityDetermine if the device management web interface is reachable from the network. Check firewall rules, ACLs, or network segmentation that may allow or block access to the management port (typically HTTP/HTTPS on ports 80, 443, or custom ports).Affected if The management interface is exposed to untrusted networks or the internet without proper access controls
-
Confirm authentication is enforcedVerify that the management interface requires valid credentials for access. Check if anonymous or default credentials provide access, and review authentication settings in the device configuration.Affected if The management interface allows unauthenticated access or uses weak/default credentials that could be trivially compromised
The environment is affected if the NCP-HG100 device is running firmware version 1.4.48.16 or earlier AND the management interface is accessible to the attacker (regardless of authentication strength, since authenticated attackers can exploit the command injection).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to a patched version if available; otherwise, restrict management interface access to trusted networks using firewall rules or VPN, enforce strong authentication credentials, and implement network segmentation to limit exposure.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-64444 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-64444 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data