CVE-2025-64465
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThere is an out of bounds read vulnerability in NI LabVIEW in lvre!DataSizeTDR() when parsing a corrupted VI file. This vulnerability may result in information disclosure or arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted VI. This vulnerability affects NI LabVIEW 2025 Q3 (25.3) and prior versions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in NI LabVIEW's lvre!DataSizeTDR() function when parsing corrupted VI files. The vulnerability occurs due to insufficient bounds checking during file parsing, potentially allowing an attacker to read arbitrary memory contents or achieve code execution by tricking a user into opening a specially crafted malicious VI file.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2022= 2023= 2024= 2025CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify LabVIEW installation and versionCheck the Windows registry at HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\National Instruments\LabVIEW for the "Default Version" value, or inspect the LabVIEW installation directory (typically C:\Program Files\National Instruments\LabVIEW XX) for version folders.Affected if Installed version matches 2022, 2023, 2024, or 2025
-
Locate the lvre libraryNavigate to the LabVIEW installation directory and locate lvre.dll or lvrt.dll (the LabVIEW Run-Time library), typically found in the \lib\msvc or \resource\plugins subdirectory.Affected if The lvre runtime library exists in the LabVIEW installation directory for versions 2022-2025
-
Verify VI file handling capabilityConfirm that LabVIEW can open and parse VI files by checking file association settings in Windows (HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\.vi) or by attempting to view a VI file's internal structure using a hex editor.Affected if LabVIEW is configured to open .vi files, enabling parsing of the vulnerable lvre!DataSizeTDR() function
-
Check for untrusted VI file receptionInspect user-accessible directories (Downloads, email attachments, network shares) for .vi files, or review email gateway/web proxy logs for incoming VI file transfers.Affected if Users have received or can receive VI files from untrusted or unknown sources that could trigger the vulnerable parsing code
Environment is affected if NI LabVIEW versions 2022 through 2025 are installed and users can open VI files from untrusted sources, enabling the out-of-bounds read in the lvre!DataSizeTDR() function.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUsers should refrain from opening VI files from untrusted or unknown sources. Organizations should implement file screening and sandboxing for received VI files until an official patch is available from National Instruments.
NI LabVIEW 2025 Q4 (25.4) or later
- 1. Identify the currently installed NI LabVIEW version by opening LabVIEW and navigating to Help > About LabVIEW, or by checking Add/Remove Programs in Windows
- 2. Obtain the fixed version of NI LabVIEW from the official NI website (www.ni.com) or the NI Installer
- 3. Download NI LabVIEW 2025 Q4 (25.4) or later from the official NI download page
- 4. Before upgrading, back up any custom VIs, libraries, and projects
- 5. Run the NI Installer and follow the on-screen instructions to upgrade LabVIEW
- 6. Verify the installation completed successfully by opening LabVIEW and confirming the version in Help > About LabVIEW
- 7. Test that previously affected VI files no longer trigger the vulnerability
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-64465 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-64465 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data