LabviewApplication · Ni

CVE-2025-64468

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-12-18
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
There is a use-after-free vulnerability in sentry!sentry_span_set_data() when parsing a corrupted VI file. This vulnerability may result in information disclosure or arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted VI. This vulnerability affects NI LabVIEW 2025 Q3 (25.3) and prior versions

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A use-after-free vulnerability exists in sentry_span_set_data() when parsing corrupted VI (LabVIEW) files. The vulnerability occurs because memory is accessed after being freed during the parsing process, potentially allowing an attacker to achieve information disclosure or arbitrary code execution by tricking a user into opening a specially crafted VI file.

MitigationUsers should avoid opening VI files from untrusted sources. Organizations should deploy the affected NI LabVIEW 2025 Q3 (25.3) and prior versions in restricted environments and monitor for vendor patches addressing this memory corruption issue.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
LabviewApplication
Affected:= 2022= 2023= 2024= 2025

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed LabVIEW version
    Open LabVIEW and go to Help > About LabVIEW, or check the installation directory folder name (typically C:\Program Files\National Instruments\LabVIEW 20XX)
    Affected if Version is 2022, 2023, 2024, or 2025 (any subversion within these release years)
  2. Confirm LabVIEW is used to open VI files
    Check for recent .vi file access - examine Windows recent files, LabVIEW's recent files list (File > Recent Files), or check the application event log for VI file operations
    Affected if LabVIEW is actively used to open .vi files from any source
  3. Assess VI file source trust posture
    Review whether VI files opened in LabVIEW originate from untrusted or unknown sources, including downloads, email attachments, or external media
    Affected if Users open VI files from untrusted or unknown origins without verification

You are affected if you have LabVIEW 2022-2025 installed AND routinely open VI files, particularly from untrusted sources, since the vulnerability triggers during VI file parsing.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Users should avoid opening VI files from untrusted sources. Organizations should deploy the affected NI LabVIEW 2025 Q3 (25.3) and prior versions in restricted environments and monitor for vendor patches addressing this memory corruption issue.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

LabVIEW version newer than 2025 Q3 (25.3) - contact NI for specific patch version

  1. Check NI's official security advisories or LabVIEW download page for the latest patched version
  2. If a newer version than 25.3 is available, download and install it from www.ni.com
  3. Ensure all LabVIEW instances are closed before installing the update
  4. After installation, verify the version number matches the patched release

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Labview Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA6.0 h
42.0 hours of engineering $7,360
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,776.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-64468 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-64468 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data