CVE-2025-64492
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSuiteCRM is an open-source, enterprise-ready Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software application. Versions 8.9.0 and below contain a time-based blind SQL Injection vulnerability. This vulnerability allows an authenticated attacker to infer data from the database by measuring response times, potentially leading to the extraction of sensitive information. It is possible for an attacker to enumerate database, table, and column names, extract sensitive data, or escalate privileges. This is fixed in version 8.9.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA time-based blind SQL injection vulnerability in SuiteCRM versions 8.9.0 and below allows authenticated attackers to inject malicious SQL queries through vulnerable application parameters. By crafting payloads containing SQL time-delay functions (e.g., SLEEP()) and measuring differential response times, attackers can infer database contents bit-by-bit, enabling enumeration of database schemas, tables, and columns, extraction of sensitive data, and privilege escalation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.0.0, < 8.9.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed SuiteCRM versionLocate the version file or admin interface (typically at /admin or in config.php) and note the exact version numberAffected if The installed version is 8.0.0 through 8.9.0 (anything less than 8.9.1)
-
Verify user authentication is enabledConfirm that the SuiteCRM application has active user accounts and login functionality is operationalAffected if User authentication is active, as the SQL injection requires valid credentials to reach the vulnerable code path
-
Check network exposure of the applicationDetermine whether the SuiteCRM web interface is accessible from network locations beyond the internal trusted networkAffected if The application is externally accessible, increasing the potential attack surface for credential-based exploits
-
Confirm database type in useReview database configuration (config.php or database connection settings) to identify if MySQL/MariaDB or PostgreSQL is in useAffected if The vulnerability exploits time-based delays using database-specific sleep functions (SLEEP for MySQL, pg_sleep for PostgreSQL)
You are affected if your SuiteCRM version is 8.0.0 through 8.9.0 and the application has active user accounts, regardless of database type used.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.9.1
Upgrade to SuiteCRM version 8.9.1 or later to remediate this vulnerability. If immediate patching is not feasible, implement input validation, apply WAF rules for SQL injection patterns, and restrict database account privileges to limit potential impact.
8.9.1
- 1. Plan and schedule a maintenance window for the SuiteCRM upgrade
- 2. Create a complete backup of the SuiteCRM database and all application files
- 3. Download SuiteCRM version 8.9.1 from the official SuiteCRM website or GitHub releases
- 4. Follow the official SuiteCRM upgrade documentation to upgrade from your current version to 8.9.1
- 5. Run any provided database upgrade scripts included with the 8.9.1 release
- 6. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the SuiteCRM version in the admin panel (typically under Admin > System Information)
- 7. Test critical CRM functionality including login, search, and data entry to ensure proper operation
- 8. Review application logs for any errors following the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-64492 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-64492 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data