CVE-2025-6451
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in code-projects Simple Online Hotel Reservation System 1.0. It has been declared as critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /admin/delete_pending.php. The manipulation of the argument transaction_id leads to sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA critical SQL injection vulnerability exists in the Simple Online Hotel Reservation System 1.0 in the file /admin/delete_pending.php. The transaction_id parameter is not properly sanitized before being used in SQL queries, allowing an attacker to inject malicious SQL commands. This can lead to unauthorized database access, data exfiltration, or manipulation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm the application is installedLocate the Simple Online Hotel Reservation System installation directory on the web server. Check for the presence of the main application files (index.php, login pages, or admin directory).Affected if The application is present on the system
-
Verify the application versionCheck the source code, version file, or any README/changelog files in the installation directory for the exact version number. Compare against version 1.0.Affected if The installed version is 1.0
-
Confirm the vulnerable file existsCheck if the file /admin/delete_pending.php exists in the web application's document root or installation directory.Affected if The file /admin/delete_pending.php exists
-
Verify admin interface is accessibleAttempt to access the /admin/ directory or login page via HTTP/HTTPS to confirm the admin panel is reachable.Affected if The admin panel is accessible over the network
-
Inspect the delete_pending.php codeRead the contents of /admin/delete_pending.php and examine how the transaction_id parameter is handled in SQL queries. Look for direct concatenation of user input into SQL statements without prepared statements or parameter binding.Affected if The transaction_id parameter is used directly in SQL queries without sanitization or prepared statements
A user is affected if they are running Simple Online Hotel Reservation System version 1.0 with the /admin/delete_pending.php file accessible and the transaction_id parameter being used unsafely in SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply a patch or refactor the code to use parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database operations involving the transaction_id parameter. Validate and sanitize all user inputs before using them in SQL queries.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-6451 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-6451 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data