CVE-2025-64550
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be exploited by a low privileged attacker to execute malicious scripts in the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction, such as visiting a crafted URL or interacting with a manipulated web page.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier allows low-privileged attackers to inject malicious scripts that execute in the victim's browser context through crafted URLs or manipulated web pages, requiring user interaction to trigger.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.24.0< 2025.12.0= 6.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check AEM product versionAccess the AEM welcome page or check the version file in the installation directory. On the welcome page, go to Tools > Operations > Diagnosis > Version Info, or look for the version.properties file in the crx-quickstart folder.Affected if The displayed version is 6.5.23 or earlier, or falls below 6.5.24.0, or is any version below 2025.12.0 on cloud/ASaaS deployments.
-
Identify AEM deployment typeDetermine if the instance is AEM on-premise (6.x) or AEM as a Cloud Service / Adobe Managed Services (AMS). Check the welcome page for 'Experience Manager' label or review the installation type in the system console.Affected if The instance is AEM 6.5 on-premise (any 6.5.x version) or AEM as a Cloud Service running a version prior to 2025.12.0.
-
Verify current version against CVE rangeCompare your installed version number to the affected ranges: AEM 6.5 versions below 6.5.24.0, or AEM Cloud/AMS versions below 2025.12.0. Note the exact version displayed in the version info.Affected if Your version is 6.5.23, 6.5.22, 6.5.21, or any earlier 6.5.x release; or your cloud version is any build prior to the 2025.12.0 release.
-
Review recent security incidentsCheck server logs and browser console for any reports of suspicious script execution, unexpected JavaScript loading, or user complaints about injected alerts/popups originating from AEM-hosted pages.Affected if Any evidence of arbitrary script execution in user browsers indicates the vulnerability may have been exploited.
You are affected if your AEM installation is version 6.5.23 or earlier on-premise, or any version below 2025.12.0 on AEM Cloud/Managed Services.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.24.02025.12.0
Apply Adobe's official security patch for AEM 6.5.23 and earlier versions; until patched, users should avoid clicking untrusted URLs and administrators should implement Content Security Policy headers.
AEM 6.5.x -> 6.5.24.0 or later; AEM Cloud/2025.x -> 2025.12.0 or later
- 1. Identify the current Adobe Experience Manager version in use by checking the product About page or system console
- 2. For AEM 6.5.x installations: Plan an upgrade to version 6.5.24.0 or later
- 3. For AEM as a Cloud Service or 2025 release line: Plan an upgrade to version 2025.12.0 or later
- 4. Test the upgrade in a non-production environment before deploying to production
- 5. After upgrading, verify the fix by checking the AEM version information
- 6. Monitor Adobe Security Bulletins for any subsequent updates
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-64550 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-64550 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data