CVE-2025-64551
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be exploited by a low privileged attacker to execute malicious scripts in the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction, such as visiting a crafted URL or interacting with a manipulated web page.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceDOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier allows low-privileged attackers to inject malicious scripts into victims' browsers via crafted URLs or manipulated web pages, exploiting improper handling of DOM elements in the web application.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.24.0< 2025.12.0= 6.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine Adobe Experience Manager versionAccess the AEM Welcome page or check the product version via the system information console (typically at /system/console/systeminfo or /libs/granite/ui/content/shell/about.html)Affected if Installed version is 6.5.x (any build before 6.5.24.0) or falls below version 2025.12.0 (e.g., 2024.x, 2025.x versions before the December 2025 release)
-
Identify active AEM instance typeVerify whether the AEM instance is running as an author environment, publish environment, or both by checking the run modes via the OSGi web console at /system/console/vmstatAffected if The instance is accessible to low-privileged users (such as anonymous users on publish instances or standard users on author instances) who can craft URLs or manipulate web page inputs
-
Inspect DOM handling in custom componentsReview any custom HTL, JavaScript, or JSP components that process URL parameters, form inputs, or client-side data by examining scripts under /apps and checking for direct DOM manipulation without sanitizationAffected if Custom components accept user-controlled input and directly inject it into the DOM without using AEM's built-in XSS protection or context-aware encoding
-
Check for Content Security Policy headersInspect HTTP response headers from the AEM server using browser developer tools or a command-line tool (e.g., curl -I <aem-url>) to see if CSP headers are presentAffected if CSP headers are absent or minimally configured, providing no defense-in-depth layer against DOM-based XSS exploitation
The environment is affected if the installed AEM version is 6.5.x before 6.5.24.0 or any version below 2025.12.0, especially when the instance accepts input from low-privileged users without CSP protections in place.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.24.02025.12.0
Upgrade Adobe Experience Manager to version 6.5.24 or later to patch the vulnerability, and implement Content Security Policy (CSP) headers as a defense-in-depth measure against XSS attacks.
AEM 6.5.24.0 or later (6.5.x line) / 2025.12.0 or later (2025 release track)
- Identify current Adobe Experience Manager version in use
- Navigate to Adobe Security Notifications page (helpx.adobe.com) for CVE-2025-64551 to obtain the official security bulletin
- Download and plan upgrade to AEM 6.5.24.0 or later for 6.5.x installations, or to 2025.12.0 or later for newer release tracks
- Test the upgrade in a non-production environment before deploying to production
- Schedule maintenance window and backup current AEM instance
- Perform the upgrade following Adobe's official documentation
- Verify the XSS vulnerability is resolved by testing with the crafted URL vector mentioned in the security bulletin
- Deploy to production environment
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-64551 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-64551 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data