CVE-2025-64553
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier allows low-privileged attackers to inject malicious JavaScript into form fields. The payload persists in the system and executes when victims browse to pages containing the compromised fields.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.24.0< 2025.12.0= 6.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check AEM versionAccess the AEM Web Console (typically at /system/console/bundles or /system/console/status-productinfo) to view the installed Adobe Experience Manager version. Alternatively, check the crx-quickstart/conf folder for version files or run 'java -jar quickstart.jar -version' if accessible.Affected if The installed version is 6.5.23 or earlier, or any 6.5.x version below 6.5.24.0, or any version below 2025.12.0, or the version matches exactly 6.5 with no specific patch level.
-
Identify custom form componentsNavigate to the AEM Forms or Adaptive Forms interface (typically at /aem/forms.html or /libs/fd/af/components) and review custom form field components that accept user input. Check /apps and /libs directories for custom form field components.Affected if Custom form field components exist that allow user input without visible server-side output encoding or input validation configured.
-
Inspect form field configurationOpen the Edit dialog for key form fields and inspect their Properties panel. Look for validation patterns, allowed values, and whether 'Use HTML Encoding' or similar output encoding options are disabled or missing.Affected if Form field properties show no input validation rules or output encoding is explicitly disabled, allowing arbitrary content to be stored.
-
Review stored form data in repositoryAccess CRXDE Lite (at /crx/de) or use the Query Builder to search form submission nodes under /content/forms or /var/af/data. Examine stored values in the data store for unencoded script tags.Affected if Stored form submission data contains raw HTML tags, script elements, or event handlers (such as <script>, javascript:, onload, onerror) that were not sanitized on submission.
A user is affected if their AEM installation version falls within 6.5.23 or earlier, or below 6.5.24.0, or below 2025.12.0, AND their forms accept user input without proper output encoding, resulting in persisted malicious scripts.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.24.02025.12.0
Apply the vendor patch (upgrade AEM beyond version 6.5.23) and implement output encoding/sanitization on form fields to prevent script execution.
AEM 6.5.24.0 or later / AEM 2025.12.0 or later
- Check current Adobe Experience Manager version in use (via /system/console or AEM dashboard)
- Plan and schedule upgrade during a maintenance window
- Perform full backup of AEM instance including repository and database
- Upgrade AEM to version 6.5.24.0 or later, OR upgrade to 2025.12.0 or later release
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the new version number
- Test the fix by attempting to inject XSS payloads in vulnerable form fields to confirm the vulnerability is mitigated
- Deploy to production after successful testing
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-64553 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-64553 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data