CVE-2025-64558
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier contain a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in form fields. A low-privileged authenticated attacker can inject malicious JavaScript payloads into vulnerable form input fields, which persist on the server. When other users browse to pages containing these compromised fields, the malicious script executes in their browsers, potentially stealing session cookies or performing actions on behalf of the victim.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.24.0< 2025.12.0= 6.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify AEM version is in affected rangeAccess the AEM Web Console ( navigate to /system/console/about ), or check the product.xml file in the installation directory. Compare the installed version to the affected ranges: < 6.5.24.0, < 2025.12.0, or exactly version 6.5.Affected if The installed version is lower than 6.5.24.0, lower than 2025.12.0, or is exactly 6.5.x
-
Confirm low-privileged user access to form authoring existsIn AEM Tools, navigate to Users/Groups administration and review the permissions assigned to standard content-author or similar low-privileged roles. Check whether these roles have create or modify permissions on form-related content paths (such as /content/forms or /etc/acs-commons).Affected if Low-privileged users (non-admin) have permissions to create or edit form fields or form templates
-
Search repository for suspicious stored payloads in form fieldsUse AEM QueryBuilder or CRX/DE Lite (navigate to /bin/querybuilder.json) to search form-related nodes for common XSS patterns. Query nodes under /content/forms and /apps that contain script tags, javascript:, or on* event handlers in field values.Affected if Any form field nodes contain encoded or raw JavaScript payloads, script tags, or event handler attributes that were not authored by administrators
You are affected if your AEM version is below 6.5.24.0 or below 2025.12.0 AND low-privileged users can author or modify form fields, or if malicious scripts already exist in form data stored in the repository.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.24.02025.12.0
Apply the vendor patch for AEM (version 6.5.24 or later). Until patched, implement output encoding on all form fields and consider disabling or restricting low-privileged user access to form authoring capabilities.
AEM 6.5.24.0 or later / AEM as a Cloud Service 2025.12.0 or later
- Log into Adobe Admin Console and download Adobe Experience Manager service pack 24 (6.5.24.0) or later
- Install the service pack on all AEM author and publish instances following Adobe's standard service pack installation procedure
- After installation, verify the AEM version shows 6.5.24.0 or later in the About Adobe Experience Manager information
- Clear the AEM dispatcher cache and rebuild to ensure updated assets are served
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,568.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-64558 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-64558 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data