CVE-2025-64562
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be exploited by a low privileged attacker to execute malicious scripts in the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction, such as visiting a crafted URL or interacting with a manipulated web page.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. This client-side vulnerability allows a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts that execute in the victim's browser through DOM manipulation, typically via crafted URLs or manipulated web pages. Exploitation requires user interaction such as visiting a malicious URL.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.24.0< 2025.12.0= 6.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine the installed AEM versionAccess the AEM About page (Help > About Adobe Experience Manager) or inspect the version.properties file in the crx-quickstart folder, or query the system console at /system/console/systeminfoAffected if The installed version is 6.5.23 or earlier, or falls within version range 6.5, or is earlier than 2025.12.0
-
Verify the specific AEM 6.5.x build versionCheck the full version string in the AEM About page or version.properties (e.g., 6.5.0.x through 6.5.23.x)Affected if The version is 6.5.23.x or any 6.5.x version earlier than 6.5.24.0
-
Identify if DOM-handling components are accessibleReview the AEM web console bundles and look for components related to HTML/Content rendering, specifically those handling DOM manipulation or user-supplied markup in author or publish instancesAffected if DOM-rendering bundles are in active state on publish-facing instances accessible to low-privilege users
-
Check for exposed endpoints handling user input in DOM contextReview published endpoints and servlets under /bin, /content, or /libs that accept URL parameters and return unfiltered HTML or JavaScript to the clientAffected if Unsanitized URL parameters or form inputs are reflected in client-side responses without contextual encoding
-
Inspect current Content Security Policy configurationCheck the HTTP response headers (CSP X-Frame-Options or custom CSP headers) on the AEM publish instance using browser DevTools or a curl request to published pagesAffected if CSP headers are missing, weak, or contain unsafe directives (like unsafe-inline) that would permit script execution from injected payloads
A user is affected if their AEM installation version is 6.5.23.x or earlier, or 6.5.x, or any version earlier than 2025.12.0 and the publish instance exposes DOM-handling features to low-privilege users without adequate CSP protection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.24.02025.12.0
Apply the vendor patch when available and implement Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to mitigate XSS execution. Review and sanitize client-side JavaScript code that handles user input and DOM manipulation.
AEM 6.5.24.0 or later (6.5.x line) / AEM 2025.12.0 or later (as a Cloud Service)
- Backup the current AEM instance and database
- Review the AEM 6.5.24.0 or 2025.12.0 release notes for any migration requirements
- Test the upgrade in a non-production environment first
- Download and install AEM 6.5.24.0 (for on-premise 6.5 installations) or deploy 2025.12.0 (for AEM as a Cloud Service)
- Verify that the XSS vulnerability is resolved by testing the affected endpoints
- Deploy to production after successful validation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-64562 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-64562 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data