CVE-2025-64783
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDNG SDK versions 1.7.0 and earlier are affected by an Integer Overflow or Wraparound vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe DNG SDK (Digital Negative, Adobe's raw image format) versions 1.7.0 and earlier contain an integer overflow vulnerability that can be triggered when processing a specially crafted malicious DNG file. Successful exploitation allows arbitrary code execution in the context of the user opening the file.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.7.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify DNG SDK presenceSearch the system for files named 'dng_sdk.dll', 'dng_negative.h', or Adobe DNG SDK related binaries and libraries. Check application dependencies or software inventory listings for 'Adobe DNG SDK' or 'dng' components.Affected if The DNG SDK library files are found on the system or listed as a software dependency.
-
Determine installed DNG SDK versionRight-click the DNG SDK DLL or binary file, select Properties, then view the Version tab to obtain the File Version or Product Version number. If using a library within an application, check the application's about or dependencies dialog for the embedded SDK version.Affected if The displayed version is 1.7.0 or any version number lower than 1.7.0 (for example, 1.6.x, 1.5.x, etc.).
-
Verify application usage of DNG processingIdentify applications or tools that process DNG raw image files. Review the application's documentation or installed components to confirm it relies on the Adobe DNG SDK for parsing DNG files.Affected if The application uses the Adobe DNG SDK to handle DNG file parsing and the SDK version is 1.7.0 or earlier.
-
Check for trusted file handling policiesReview whether the environment processes DNG files from untrusted or unknown sources, such as user uploads, downloaded raw images, or third-party content.Affected if DNG files from untrusted sources are processed by any application using the affected DNG SDK version.
You are affected if the Adobe DNG SDK version installed in your environment is 1.7.0 or earlier and any application or tool on the system uses it to process DNG image files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate DNG SDK to a version newer than 1.7.0 when a patch is released by the vendor. Until then, avoid opening untrusted DNG files from unknown or untrusted sources.
DNG SDK version greater than 1.7.0 (check Adobe security bulletin for exact fixed release)
- Verify the current DNG SDK version in use by checking project dependencies or library files
- Navigate to the official Adobe security bulletin on helpx.adobe.com for CVE-2025-64783 to obtain the exact fixed version number
- Download the fixed DNG SDK version from the official Adobe source
- Update the project dependency or replace the SDK library files with the fixed version
- Rebuild and test the application to ensure compatibility with the new SDK version
- Verify that the integer overflow vulnerability is resolved by confirming the SDK version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-64783 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-64783 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data