CVE-2025-64784
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDNG SDK versions 1.7.0 and earlier are affected by a Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could lead to memory exposure or application denial of service. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to disclose sensitive memory information. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe DNG SDK (Digital Negative SDK) versions 1.7.0 and earlier contain a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability that can be triggered when processing a specially crafted malicious DNG image file. Successful exploitation can lead to memory information disclosure or application denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.7.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate DNG SDK libraries in your environmentSearch for files named 'dng_sdk.lib', 'dng.dll', 'libdng.a', or similar DNG SDK binary files on your system. Check common installation directories such as /usr/lib, /usr/local/lib, Windows\System32, or application-specific lib folders.Affected if DNG SDK library files are found and their version is 1.7.0 or earlier (compare your found version against the affected range)
-
Identify applications using the DNG SDKSearch your codebase or application binaries for references to 'dng' namespace, 'DNG SDK', or 'AdobeDNG' strings. Review software dependency manifests (like .deps, package.json, requirements.txt) or linker inputs that include DNG SDK.Affected if An application or service links against or embeds the DNG SDK and processes DNG image files from external or untrusted sources
-
Determine DNG processing data flowInspect configuration files, application logs, or code that shows how DNG files enter your system. Look for file upload handlers, image processing pipelines, or thumbnail generation services that accept DNG input.Affected if Your system accepts DNG files from users, external APIs, or untrusted sources and passes them to DNG SDK functions for processing
-
Check installed SDK version via metadataIf the SDK was installed via a package manager (npm, pip, nuget, brew), run 'npm list dng-sdk', 'pip show dng-sdk', or equivalent to query the installed version. Check any version.h, version.cpp, or README files distributed with the SDK.Affected if The reported version number is 1.7.0 or lower, indicating the vulnerable version is in use
-
Audit DNG file processing endpointsReview web application endpoints, CLI tools, or background jobs that handle DNG image uploads or batch processing. Verify whether the DNG SDK is invoked without prior validation or sanitization of the input file.Affected if DNG files from external or untrusted sources are processed directly by the DNG SDK without sandboxing or content scanning
You are affected if your environment contains a version of the Adobe DNG SDK at 1.7.0 or earlier that processes DNG image files from untrusted or external sources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUsers should avoid opening untrusted or suspicious DNG files. Organizations should update the DNG SDK to a version beyond 1.7.0 once a patch is released, and scan existing DNG processing pipelines for usage of the affected SDK versions.
Latest available DNG SDK version (greater than 1.7.0)
- 1. Navigate to the Adobe DNG SDK download page on helpx.adobe.com
- 2. Locate the most recent version of the DNG SDK (verify version number is greater than 1.7.0)
- 3. Download the updated DNG SDK package for your platform
- 4. Replace older DNG SDK files in your project with the new version
- 5. Rebuild and test your application to ensure the SDK functions correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-64784 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-64784 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data