CVE-2025-64797
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier allows low-privilege attackers to inject malicious JavaScript into form fields. The malicious payload persists in the system and executes in victim users' browsers when they view pages containing the compromised form fields.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.24.0< 2025.12.0= 6.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed AEM versionAccess the AEM system information page at /system/console/about or query the version endpoint at /libs/cq/core/content/info.json. Locate the version number in the response.Affected if The installed version is 6.5.23 or earlier, equals 6.5, or is below 2025.12.0.
-
Verify AEM 6.5 service pack levelNavigate to Help > System Information in the AEM welcome page, or check the installed service pack via the Felix Console at /system/console/bundles to confirm the exact 6.5.x build number.Affected if The service pack version is below 6.5.24.0.
-
Confirm form creation functionality is accessibleCheck if low-privilege users (such as those with only content-author or contributor roles) can access the Forms functionality at /aem/forms or create form containers within AEM Sites.Affected if Low-privilege users can create or edit form components in AEM.
-
Review existing form field data for suspicious contentQuery the AEM repository (via CRXDE Lite at /crx/de or the Query tool) for form field nodes under /content and inspect stored values for unusual script tags, event handlers, or encoded JavaScript patterns.Affected if Form field data contains unsanitized HTML or script tags that could execute in a browser.
-
Inspect form field input validation settingsAccess the Form Component dialog configuration for affected forms and check whether server-side input validation and output encoding are explicitly enabled on each form field.Affected if Form fields lack server-side validation and rely solely on client-side or no input sanitization.
Your environment is affected if the installed AEM version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND low-privilege users can inject content into form fields without server-side validation catching the payload.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.24.02025.12.0
Update Adobe Experience Manager to a version newer than 6.5.23, or implement server-side input validation and output encoding on affected form fields to prevent script injection.
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.24.0 or Adobe Experience Manager 2025.12.0
- Review the current Adobe Experience Manager version installed in your environment
- Download Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.24.0 (for AEM 6.5 on-premise) or 2025.12.0 (for AEM as a Cloud Service) from the official Adobe distribution portal
- Plan and schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade following Adobe's recommended upgrade best practices
- Back up all AEM repositories, configurations, and custom code before proceeding
- Perform the upgrade in a non-production environment first to validate compatibility
- After successful testing in non-production, apply the upgrade to production environments
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the AEM version in the Help > About Adobe Experience Manager console
- Validate that custom form components and user-generated content workflows function correctly post-upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-64797 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-64797 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data