CVE-2025-64800
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier allows low-privileged authenticated users to inject malicious JavaScript into form fields. The injected script persists on the server and executes in the browsers of users who view pages containing the compromised form fields.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.24.0< 2025.12.0= 6.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed AEM versionAccess the AEM Web Console or system console (typically at /system/console/bundles or /system/console/webconsole) to view the installed product version, or check the quickstart properties file in the AEM installation directoryAffected if The installed version is 6.5.23 or earlier, or any version before 2025.12.0, indicating the vulnerability is present in the baseline version
-
Verify low-privileged user access to formsReview user group memberships and permissions in AEM to identify users with contributor or author-level access (not admin) who can access and edit form componentsAffected if Low-privileged authenticated users have write access to form fields, which would allow them to inject malicious scripts
-
Inspect stored form data for injected scriptsQuery the AEM repository (via CRXDE Lite at /crx/de or using the Query tool) for form field content nodes and inspect stored values for suspicious patterns such as <script> tags, javascript: URIs, or HTML event handlers (onclick, onerror, etc.)Affected if Any form field values contain unescaped script tags, event handlers, or javascript: protocol URIs that could execute in user browsers
-
Review recent form submission historyCheck the AEM workflow or form submission logs for recent entries, or examine the content repository under /content/forms for any forms with unexpected or encoded content in field valuesAffected if There are recent form submissions containing encoded or obfuscated content that may represent attempted XSS injection
Your environment is affected if the installed AEM version is earlier than 6.5.24.0 or earlier than 2025.12.0 AND low-privileged users have the ability to modify form field content that gets stored and displayed to other users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.24.02025.12.0
Apply Adobe's official patch by upgrading Adobe Experience Manager to version 6.5.24 or later, which addresses this stored XSS vulnerability.
AEM 6.5.24.0 or later
- Check current Adobe Experience Manager version in use (Help > About Adobe Experience Manager)
- Review the AEM 6.5.24.0 release notes for any pre-upgrade requirements or migration steps
- Create a full backup of the AEM instance including repository, database, and configurations
- Test the upgrade in a non-production environment first
- Apply the upgrade to AEM 6.5.24.0 or later release
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version number
- Clear browser cache and test that the application functions normally
- Validate that the XSS vulnerability is patched by attempting to inject script in the previously affected form fields
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-64800 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-64800 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data