CVE-2025-64823
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.23 and earlier allows low-privileged attackers to inject malicious JavaScript into form fields. The malicious payload is stored in the system and executes when users view pages containing the affected fields.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.24.0< 2025.12.0= 6.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine Adobe Experience Manager versionAccess the AEM Web Console Bundle information page at /system/console/bundles or check the version.properties file in the crx-quickstart folder. The version is also displayed on the AEM Welcome page at /libs/granite/core/content/login.htmlAffected if The installed version is earlier than 6.5.24.0, earlier than 2025.12.0, or exactly 6.5.x
-
Verify AEM product edition and release lineConfirm the AEM installation is the 6.5.x LTS line or the 2025 release train by checking the product name in /system/console/bundles or the crx-quickstart/license.properties fileAffected if The installation belongs to the 6.5 LTS or 2025 release train and version check from step 1 shows a vulnerable version
-
Check if author instance is accessibleVerify whether the AEM author instance is reachable at the standard author port (typically 4502) or the publish instance (typically 4503) by accessing /libs/granite/core/content/login.htmlAffected if The instance is accessible and the version check confirms a vulnerable release - the stored XSS can be exploited by any low-privileged user with form submission access
-
Identify exposed form componentsReview any custom or out-of-the-box form components in the AEM Forms or Core Components that accept user input and store data in the JCR repository. Check /apps and /libs for form-related components with input fieldsAffected if Form components that accept and store user input exist in the system - combined with a vulnerable version, these fields can accept malicious scripts that persist and execute when viewed
You are affected if your AEM installation runs version 6.5.23 or earlier, version 6.5.x without the .24 update, or any version below 2025.12.0, and you have form components that accept and store user input accessible to low-privileged users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.24.02025.12.0
Update Adobe Experience Manager to version 6.5.24 or later to remediate this vulnerability. Additionally, implement input validation, output encoding on form fields, and Content Security Policy (CSP) headers as defense-in-depth measures.
AEM 6.5.24.0+ or AEM 2025.12.0+ (depending on your release line)
- Identify your current Adobe Experience Manager version by checking the product information in the AEM welcome page or system console
- For AEM 6.5.x versions: Upgrade to AEM 6.5.24.0 or later
- For AEM 2025.x versions: Upgrade to 2025.12.0 or later
- After upgrading, verify the version in the system console to confirm the patch was applied
- Test the affected form fields to ensure the XSS vulnerability is remediated
- Review Adobe Experience Manager release notes for the target version for any known issues or migration requirements
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-64823 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-64823 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data