CVE-2025-64992
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA command injection vulnerability was discovered in TeamViewer DEX (former 1E DEX), specifically within the 1E-Nomad-PauseNomadJobQueue instruction prior V25. Improper input validation, allowing authenticated attackers with Actioner privileges to inject arbitrary commands. Exploitation enables remote execution of elevated commands on devices connected to the platform.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA command injection vulnerability exists in TeamViewer DEX (1E DEX) within the 1E-Nomad-PauseNomadJobQueue instruction versions prior to V25. The flaw stems from improper input validation that allows authenticated attackers with Actioner privileges to inject arbitrary OS commands, leading to elevated remote code execution on connected devices.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 25.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm TeamViewer DEX installationLocate TeamViewer DEX (1E DEX) installation on the system, typically as a Windows service or application. Check installed programs list or running services for 'TeamViewer DEX' or '1E DEX' components.Affected if TeamViewer DEX is not found on the system, the vulnerability does not apply.
-
Retrieve installed TeamViewer DEX versionIdentify the installed version of TeamViewer DEX through the application, service properties, or version information. Common locations include the service executable, program directory, or system registry.Affected if The installed version is any version prior to V25 (e.g., 24.x, earlier versions).
-
Verify 1E-Nomad-PauseNomadJobQueue instruction is configuredCheck if the 1E-Nomad-PauseNomadJobQueue instruction is present in the TeamViewer DEX configuration or is actively used in the environment. This may appear in instruction definitions, task configurations, or job queue settings.Affected if The 1E-Nomad-PauseNomadJobQueue instruction exists and is available for use by authenticated users.
-
Confirm Actioner privilege availabilityDetermine whether any user or service account in the environment possesses Actioner privileges within TeamViewer DEX, as this privilege level is required to exploit the flaw.Affected if Users with Actioner privileges exist and can access the 1E-Nomad-PauseNomadJobQueue instruction.
A user is affected if TeamViewer DEX versions prior to V25 are installed AND the 1E-Nomad-PauseNomadJobQueue instruction is configured with Actioner privileges accessible to authenticated attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped25.0
Upgrade to TeamViewer DEX version V25 or later which contains the patched input validation for the 1E-Nomad-PauseNomadJobQueue instruction.
TeamViewer DEX version 25.0
- 1. Verify current TeamViewer DEX (1E DEX) installation version by checking the installed software or administrative console
- 2. Download TeamViewer DEX version 25.0 or later from the official TeamViewer portal or vendor distribution channels
- 3. Create a backup of the current configuration and any custom settings
- 4. Follow vendor documentation for upgrading TeamViewer DEX to version 25.0
- 5. After upgrade, verify the 1E-Nomad-PauseNomadJobQueue instruction is updated and no longer accepts arbitrary command injection
- 6. Test that authenticated users with Actioner privileges can only perform expected operations
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-64992 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-64992 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data