CVE-2025-65075
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWaveView client allows users to execute restricted set of predefined commands and scripts on the connected WaveStore Server. A malicious attacker with high-privileges is able to read or delete files, with the permissions of dvr user, on the server using path traversal in the alog script. This issue was fixed in version 6.44.44
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencePath traversal vulnerability in the alog script of WaveStore Server allows authenticated high-privilege users to read or delete files outside the intended directory by using '../' sequences. The vulnerability stems from insufficient input validation on file paths, and the attack executes with dvr user permissions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 6.42.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify WaveStore Server versionLocate and read the WaveStore Server version information, typically found in the software's about panel, installation directory, or by running 'wavestore --version' or 'wavestore -v' from the command line if availableAffected if The installed version is 6.42.4 or lower (any version up to and including 6.42.4)
-
Locate the alog scriptSearch for the 'alog' script in the WaveStore installation directory, commonly under /opt/wavestore/, /usr/local/wavestore/, or the server's bin/scripts folder. Use 'find / -name alog -type f 2>/dev/null' if filesystem access permitsAffected if The alog script exists and is present in the WaveStore installation directory
-
Verify high-privilege user accessReview user account permissions in the WaveStore admin interface or system user database. Identify accounts with administrative or high-privilege roles that can access the alog functionalityAffected if There are authenticated users with high-privilege or administrative access to the WaveStore Server
-
Test for path traversal vulnerability (if authorized)If you have legitimate authorization and access, attempt to access a test file outside the intended directory using '../' sequences through the alog script parameter, such as 'alog ../../../etc/passwd' or similar path constructionAffected if The alog script accepts and processes '../' sequences, allowing access to files outside the intended directory scope
A user is affected if they are running WaveStore Server version 6.42.4 or lower AND have high-privilege users who can access the alog script, which would allow path traversal attacks to read or delete files outside the intended directory with dvr user permissions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade WaveStore Server to version 6.44.44 or later to obtain the patched alog script with proper path validation. Until then, restrict high-privilege access and monitor for suspicious file access patterns.
Upgrade to WaveStore Server version 6.44.44
- 1. Back up the current Video Management Software Server configuration and database
- 2. Download WaveStore Server version 6.44.44 from the official vendor website (www.wavestore.com)
- 3. Stop the WaveStore Server service
- 4. Install version 6.44.4 by running the installer with appropriate privileges
- 5. Restart the WaveStore Server service
- 6. Verify the installation by checking the version number in the server administration interface
- 7. Test that the path traversal vulnerability is no longer exploitable in the alog script functionality
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-65075 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-65075 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data