CVE-2025-65133
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA SQL injection vulnerability exists in the School Management System (version 1.0) by manikandan580. An unauthenticated or authenticated remote attacker can supply a crafted HTTP request to the affected endpoint to manipulate SQL query logic and extract sensitive database information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in School Management System v1.0 allows unauthenticated or authenticated remote attackers to manipulate SQL query logic through crafted HTTP requests to the affected endpoint, enabling extraction of sensitive database information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm School Management System installationLocate the application by checking web server document roots, looking for directories named 'school' or 'schoolms', or checking running web applications on the serverAffected if The application installed is School Management System version 1.0
-
Verify the exact version numberAccess the admin panel, check /about page, examine version.txt or README files in the application root, or query the application for its version identifierAffected if The installed version matches v1.0 exactly
-
Identify HTTP-accessible endpointsReview web server access logs for requests to the application, examine application routing files, or use directory enumeration on the web root to discover active endpointsAffected if The application exposes HTTP endpoints that handle user input
-
Examine database query implementationLocate PHP, ASP, or other server-side files that handle database interactions and review how SQL queries are constructedAffected if SQL queries are built using string concatenation or direct user input without parameterized queries or prepared statements
-
Test input handling for SQL injectionIf authorized, submit single quote characters or common SQL injection patterns to identified input fields and observe for database errors or unexpected behaviorAffected if Application responds with SQL syntax errors or displays unexpected data from crafted input
-
Review database user permissionsExamine the database configuration file to determine what privileges the application database user hasAffected if The database user has broad permissions beyond what the application requires
A user is affected if they have School Management System v1.0 deployed with HTTP-accessible endpoints that use dynamic SQL queries without parameterized statements.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries/prepared statements across all database interactions; implement strict input validation and apply principle of least privilege to database accounts.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-65133 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-65133 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data