CVE-2025-6520
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Abis Technology BAPSIS allows Blind SQL Injection. This issue affects BAPSIS: before 202510271606.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAbis Technology BAPSIS contains a blind SQL injection vulnerability in versions before 202510271606. The vulnerability allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through improper neutralization of special elements, potentially enabling data exfiltration or database compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm BAPSIS is installedIdentify if the AbisTechnology BAPSIS application is running in your environment by checking for the application process, service, or web endpoints responding with BAPSIS-specific contentAffected if BAPSIS is present in the environment and version is below 202510271606 or version cannot be determined
-
Check installed BAPSIS versionLocate the BAPSIS application version information - typically found in the software itself, an about page, installation directory, or configuration file - and compare it to the fixed version 202510271606Affected if Installed version is lower than 202510271606 or version information is unavailable
-
Identify exposed input fieldsEnumerate web forms, API parameters, login fields, search inputs, or other user-supplied input points that accept data and are processed by BAPSIS backend database queriesAffected if Any unsanitized input fields accepting user data are accessible over the network without authentication
-
Verify SQL query implementationReview application configuration or code if accessible to determine whether input fields use parameterized queries/prepared statements or direct SQL concatenationAffected if Input fields use direct SQL string concatenation rather than parameterized queries and are network-accessible
You are affected if BAPSIS is running with a version below 202510271606 and has network-accessible input fields that do not use parameterized queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade BAPSIS to version 202510271606 or later. Until then, restrict network access to the BAPSIS interface and monitor for suspicious SQL-like patterns in input fields.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-6520 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-6520 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data