CVE-2025-65354
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper input handling in /Grocery/search_products_itname.php inPuneethReddyHC event-management 1.0 permits SQL injection via the sitem_name POST parameter. Crafted payloads can alter query logic and disclose database contents. Exploitation may result in sensitive data disclosure and backend compromise.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA SQL injection vulnerability exists in the search_products_itname.php file of the event-management 1.0 application. The sitem_name POST parameter is directly used in SQL queries without proper sanitization or parameterized queries, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary SQL syntax and manipulate query logic.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the vulnerable PHP fileSearch the web server filesystem for the file search_products_itname.php within the event-management application directoryAffected if The file exists in the deployed application
-
Verify the application versionCheck the application version by inspecting version files, composer.json, or any version metadata in the event-management installation directoryAffected if The installed version is 1.0 of Puneethreddyhc Event Management
-
Examine the SQL query implementationOpen search_products_itname.php and inspect how the sitem_name POST parameter is used in SQL queries - look for direct string concatenation or lack of prepared statementsAffected if The sitem_name parameter is concatenated directly into SQL queries without parameterization
-
Confirm parameter is user-controllableVerify that the sitem_name parameter is received via $_POST and used in the query without sanitization functions like mysqli_real_escape_string, htmlspecialchars, or PDO prepared statementsAffected if The sitem_name POST parameter flows directly into the SQL query without sanitization or parameterized binding
-
Check if the file is web-accessibleDetermine if the search_products_itname.php file is accessible via the web server (HTTP/HTTPS endpoints)Affected if The file is reachable over the network and accepts user input
You are affected if the event-management 1.0 application is deployed with the search_products_itname.php file accessible and the sitem_name POST parameter is used in unsanitized SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL query construction with prepared statements/parameterized queries, implement strict input validation on the sitem_name parameter, and apply principle of least privilege to the database user.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-65354 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-65354 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data