CVE-2025-6575
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Dolusoft Omaspot allows Reflected XSS. This issue affects Omaspot: before 12.09.2025.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceReflected XSS vulnerability in Dolusoft Omaspot where user-supplied input is not properly sanitized or escaped before being rendered in web pages, allowing attackers to inject malicious JavaScript through crafted URLs.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 12.09.2025CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Dolusoft Omaspot installationLocate Omaspot installation directories or check running services for Omaspot processesAffected if Omaspot software is present on the system
-
Determine installed Omaspot versionCheck the application version through its web interface, configuration files, or installation metadataAffected if The installed version is earlier than 12.09.2025
-
Verify web interface accessibilityConfirm the Omaspot web server is running and accessibleAffected if The web interface is exposed and reachable
-
Check for user input handling in URLsReview URL parameters and query strings used by Omaspot pages for lack of output encodingAffected if User-supplied parameters are reflected in responses without proper escaping
You are affected if Dolusoft Omaspot is installed with a version earlier than 12.09.2025 and its web interface handles user input through URL parameters.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped12.09.2025
Implement proper input validation and output encoding/escaping for all user-supplied data before rendering in HTML context.
Omaspot version 12.09.2025 or later
- 1. Verify current Omaspot version by checking the application admin panel or system information
- 2. Obtain the latest version of Omaspot (12.09.2025 or later) from Dolusoft's official distribution channels
- 3. Review Dolusoft's release notes for version 12.09.2025 to understand changes and any prerequisites
- 4. Perform a full backup of the Omaspot application, database, and configuration files
- 5. Test the upgrade in a staging environment before deploying to production
- 6. Execute the upgrade process following Dolusoft's documented upgrade procedure
- 7. After upgrade, verify the XSS vulnerability is resolved by testing input fields that could be vulnerable to reflected XSS
- 8. Confirm normal application functionality is maintained post-upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,512.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-6575 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-6575 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data