Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2025-66083

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-11-21
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing Authorization vulnerability in magepeopleteam WpEvently mage-eventpress allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects WpEvently: from n/a through <= 5.0.4.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Missing Authorization vulnerability in the WpEvently (mage-eventpress) WordPress plugin allows attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels. This broken access control issue likely enables unauthorized users to access administrative functions or sensitive data that should require proper authentication and authorization.

MitigationUpdate WpEvently plugin to the latest version. If no patched version is available, disable the plugin until a fix is released, and implement proper authorization checks on all sensitive functions and endpoints.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify WpEvently plugin is installed
    In WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins. Look for 'WpEvently' or 'mage-eventpress' in the plugin list. Note the installed version displayed.
    Affected if The plugin WpEvently or mage-eventpress appears in the installed plugins list
  2. Identify installed plugin version
    In the plugins list, locate the version number displayed under the plugin name. Compare this version against any known version numbers from the vendor or changelog.
    Affected if The installed version is older than the patched version (if known) or matches the vulnerable version range
  3. Test unauthenticated access to admin endpoints
    Using a tool like curl or Burp, send requests to typical plugin admin AJAX endpoints (such as /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=mage_eventpress_*) without providing authentication cookies or credentials.
    Affected if Requests return successful responses containing administrative data or trigger actions without returning an authentication error
  4. Check for exposed sensitive functions
    Review the plugin's publicly accessible AJAX actions by searching for 'add_action' calls with 'wp_ajax_nopriv_' or 'wp_ajax_' hooks in the plugin source code. These indicate endpoints accessible without login.
    Affected if The plugin registers AJAX actions accessible to unauthenticated users (wp_ajax_nopriv_) that handle sensitive operations
  5. Inspect user role capability settings
    Examine the plugin's capability checks on sensitive functions. Look in the plugin code for current_user_can() calls or role verification logic on administrative functions.
    Affected if The plugin lacks capability checks or uses weak checks (like relying solely on login status without verifying admin role) on sensitive operations

If the WpEvently/mage-eventpress plugin is installed and exposes admin functions or AJAX endpoints accessible to unauthenticated or unauthorized users, the environment is likely affected by this broken access control vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update WpEvently plugin to the latest version. If no patched version is available, disable the plugin until a fix is released, and implement proper authorization checks on all sensitive functions and endpoints.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,640
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-66083 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-66083 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data