Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2025-66129

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-12-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing Authorization vulnerability in wppochipp Pochipp pochipp allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Pochipp: from n/a through <= 1.18.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Missing Authorization vulnerability in the wppochipp Pochipp WordPress plugin allows unauthenticated or unauthorized users to access protected functionality due to incorrectly configured access control security levels, potentially enabling privilege escalation or unauthorized data access.

MitigationUpdate Pochipp plugin to the latest patched version and audit all access control configurations to ensure proper authorization checks are enforced on all sensitive endpoints and functions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Pochipp plugin is installed
    Check for the presence of the Pochipp plugin directory in your WordPress installation at /wp-content/plugins/ or search for 'pochipp' in the wp_posts table with post_type='plugin'.
    Affected if The Pochipp plugin files exist in the WordPress plugins directory.
  2. Determine installed Pochipp version
    Read the plugin version from the main Pochipp plugin file header (typically /wp-content/plugins/pochipp/pochipp.php) or check the version listed in the WordPress plugin admin page.
    Affected if Unable to determine the version, or version is older than the patched release that addresses CVE-2025-66129.
  3. Identify plugin AJAX actions and endpoints
    Search the Pochipp plugin files for add_action calls registering AJAX hooks (wp_ajax_pochipp*, wp_ajax_nopriv_pochipp*) and REST API route registrations. Review which hooks lack capability checks or nonce verification.
    Affected if AJAX actions are registered with wp_ajax_nopriv_* (allowing unauthenticated access) and do not include proper capability checks or authorization validation.
  4. Check admin page access controls
    Review admin menu registrations and page callbacks in the Pochipp plugin to verify that admin pages or functions performing sensitive operations include current_user_can() checks or role capability validation.
    Affected if Admin functionality can be accessed without proper authorization checks, allowing low-privileged or unauthenticated users to trigger sensitive operations.
  5. Audit capability checks in sensitive functions
    Search plugin source code for critical functions (settings updates, data modifications, user-related operations) and verify they include current_user_can(), check_admin_referer(), or wp_verify_nonce() validation before execution.
    Affected if Sensitive functions lack authorization verification, allowing unauthorized execution.

You are affected if the Pochipp plugin is installed and any AJAX actions allow unauthenticated access, admin functions lack capability checks, or sensitive operations omit authorization validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update Pochipp plugin to the latest patched version and audit all access control configurations to ensure proper authorization checks are enforced on all sensitive endpoints and functions.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-66129 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-66129 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data