CVE-2025-66287
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in WebKitGTK. Processing malicious web content can cause an unexpected process crash due to improper memory handling.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceWebKitGTK contains a memory handling flaw that causes an unexpected process crash when processing malicious web content. The vulnerability stems from improper memory management during web content processing, leading to a denial-of-service condition.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm WebKitGTK installationCheck for WebKitGTK libraries on the system. On Linux, search for libwebkit files: `find /usr -name 'libwebkit*' 2>/dev/null` or check package manager: `dpkg -l | grep webkit` (Debian) / `rpm -qa | grep webkit` (RHEL)Affected if WebKitGTK libraries are found on the system
-
Identify installed WebKitGTK versionQuery the package manager for the exact version installed: `dpkg -l | grep webkitgtk` or `rpm -q webkitgtk` or check the library version directly via `pkg-config --modversion webkitgtk-4.1` (or webkitgtk-4.0 for older variants)Affected if Version cannot be determined or is earlier than the patched release
-
Identify WebKitGTK-based applicationsList applications that link to WebKitGTK: `ldconfig -p | grep webkit` or check running processes for applications that handle web content (browsers, email clients with HTML rendering, help viewers)Affected if Applications using WebKitGTK are installed and running
-
Verify web content processing is enabledExamine configuration files and runtime settings of WebKitGTK-based applications to confirm whether processing of web/HTTP content is active or permittedAffected if Web content processing is enabled or untrusted content can be loaded
The environment is affected if WebKitGTK is installed and applications using it can process web content, as the memory handling flaw triggers during malicious web content processing.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate WebKitGTK to the patched version once available; until then, restrict or disable processing of untrusted web content through WebKitGTK-based applications.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-66287 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-66287 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data