CVE-2025-66498
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA memory corruption vulnerability exists in the 3D annotation handling of Foxit PDF Reader due to insufficient bounds checking when parsing U3D data. When opening a PDF file containing malformed or specially crafted PRC content, out-of-bounds memory access may occur, resulting in memory corruption.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFoxit PDF Reader contains a memory corruption vulnerability in its 3D annotation parsing component. Insufficient bounds checking during U3D data processing allows malformed PRC content within PDF files to trigger out-of-bounds memory access, potentially enabling arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 13.2.1.23955>= 14.0.0.33046, <= 14.0.1.33197>= 2023.1.0.15510, <= 2023.3.0.23028>= 2024.1.0.23997, <= 2024.4.1.27687>= 2025.1.0.27937, <= 2025.2.1.33197<= 2025.2.1.33197CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Foxit product and versionOpen Foxit and navigate to Help > About, or check the installed programs list in Windows Control Panel. Note whether you have Foxit PDF Reader or Foxit PDF Editor.Affected if The installed version falls within any of these vulnerable ranges: Foxit PDF Editor <= 13.2.1.23955; >= 14.0.0.33046 and <= 14.0.1.33197; >= 2023.1.0.15510 and <= 2023.3.0.23028; >= 2024.1.0.23997 and <= 2024.4.1.27687; >= 2025.1.0.27937 and <= 2025.2.1.33197. Foxit PDF Reader versions <= 2025.2.1.3
-
Verify if 3D annotation support is enabled in Foxit settingsOpen Foxit preferences or settings and look for options related to 3D annotations, U3D content, or multimedia content. Check whether the setting to enable or display 3D annotations is turned on.Affected if 3D annotation support is enabled, allowing Foxit to process U3D/PRC data within PDF files.
-
Confirm Protected View or sandbox is not enforced for untrusted filesCheck Foxit security settings to see if Protected View is enabled for files from untrusted sources. This setting is typically found in File > Preferences > Security.Affected if Protected View is disabled or set to off, allowing untrusted PDF files to be opened with full functionality including 3D content processing.
-
Check if the system routinely opens PDFs from untrusted or unknown sourcesReview your workflow for handling PDF files. Determine if you frequently open PDFs from email attachments, downloads, or other unverified sources that may contain 3D content.Affected if You regularly process PDF files from untrusted sources without sandbox protections, increasing the likelihood of encountering a malicious PRC/U3D payload.
You are affected if you have Foxit PDF Reader <= 2025.2.1.33197 or any vulnerable Foxit PDF Editor version listed, and 3D annotation processing is enabled while handling untrusted PDFs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor-supplied patches from Foxit when available. Until then, mitigate by disabling 3D annotations in Foxit settings, enabling Protected View for untrusted files, and exercising caution with PDF sources.
Pdf Reader: 2025.2.2+ | Pdf Editor: 13.2.1.23956+, 14.0.1.33198+, 2023.3.0.23029+, or 2024.4.1.27688+ (depending on major version line)
- 1. Identify the exact Foxit product (Pdf Reader or Pdf Editor) and current installed version from Help > About Foxit PDF.
- 2. For Pdf Reader: Upgrade to version 2025.2.2 or later from https://www.foxit.com/pdf-reader/
- 3. For Pdf Editor: Upgrade to version 13.2.1.23956 or later for version 13.x; upgrade to version 14.0.1.33198 or later for version 14.x; upgrade to version 2023.3.0.23029 or later for 2023.x releases; upgrade to version 2024.4.1.27688 or later for 2024.x releases.
- 4. Download the appropriate installer from the official Foxit website.
- 5. Run the installer and follow the prompts to complete the upgrade.
- 6. Restart Foxit after the upgrade completes.
- 7. Verify the new version by checking Help > About Foxit PDF to confirm the vulnerability is remediated.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,304.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-66498 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-66498 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data