CVE-2025-66499
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the PDF parsing of Foxit PDF Reader when processing specially crafted JBIG2 data. An integer overflow in the calculation of the image buffer size may occur, potentially allowing a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFoxit PDF Reader contains a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in its PDF parsing engine when processing JBIG2 image data embedded in PDFs. The vulnerability stems from an integer overflow when calculating the required image buffer size, which can result in allocating a smaller-than-needed buffer and subsequently writing beyond its bounds, potentially enabling arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 13.2.1.23955>= 14.0.0.33046, <= 14.0.1.33197>= 2023.1.0.15510, <= 2023.3.0.23028>= 2024.1.0.23997, <= 2024.4.1.27687>= 2025.1.0.27937, <= 2025.2.1.33197<= 13.2.1.63315>= 14.0.0.33046, <= 14.0.1.69005>= 2023.1.0.15510, <= 2023.3.0.63083>= 2024.1.0.23997, <= 2024.4.1.66479>= 2025.1.0.27937, <= 2025.2.1.69005<= 2025.2.1.33197<= 2025.2.1.69005CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Foxit PDF product is installedLocate Foxit PDF Reader or Foxit PDF Editor installation directory, typically under Program Files or Program Files (x86). Check for FoxitPDFReader.exe or FoxitPDFEditor.exe files.Affected if Either Foxit PDF Reader or Foxit PDF Editor executable is found on the system.
-
Retrieve installed product versionRight-click the Foxit executable, select Properties, and view the Details tab for the Product Version field. Alternatively, run the executable with a version flag or check Add/Remove Programs for the installed version.Affected if A version number is obtained that can be compared against affected ranges.
-
Compare version against affected rangesMatch your installed version number against the following affected ranges: versions <= 13.2.1.23955; versions >= 14.0.0.33046 through <= 14.0.1.33197; versions >= 2023.1.0.15510 through <= 2023.3.0.23028; versions >= 2024.1.0.23997 through <= 2024.4.1.27687; versions >= 2025.1.0.27937 through <= 2025.2.1.33197; or versions <= 13.2.1.63315; versions >= 14.0.0.33046 through <= 14.0.1.69005; versions >= 2023.1.0.15510 through <= 2023.3.0.63083; versions >= 2024.1.0.23997 through <= 2024.4.1.66479; versions >= 2025.1.0.27937 through <= 2025.2.1.69005; or versions <= 2025.2.1.33197 or <= 2025.2.1.6Affected if The installed version falls within any of the listed affected version ranges.
-
Determine if JBIG2 image rendering is activeOpen Foxit Reader/Editor preferences or settings panel. Look for image rendering, PDF conversion, or security settings related to JBIG2 image decoding. Check if the feature is enabled or set to automatic processing.Affected if JBIG2 image rendering or decoding is enabled, meaning PDFs containing JBIG2 data will trigger the vulnerable parsing code path.
-
Assess exposure to untrusted PDFsReview recent PDF files opened with the Foxit product. Determine if documents from external or untrusted sources have been processed, as the vulnerability is triggered by specially crafted PDF files with embedded JBIG2 image data.Affected if The product has been used to open PDF files from untrusted or unknown sources, which could contain malicious JBIG2 payload.
If Foxit PDF Reader or Editor is installed with a version matching any of the affected ranges and JBIG2 image rendering is enabled, the environment is vulnerable to CVE-2025-66499 when processing crafted PDF files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied patches from Foxit when available. Until patched, avoid opening PDF files from untrusted sources and consider disabling JBIG2 rendering in reader settings if the option exists.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-66499 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-66499 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data