CVE-2025-66595
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been found in FAST/TOOLS provided by Yokogawa Electric Corporation. This product is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). When a user accesses a link crafted by an attacker, the user’s account could be compromised. The affected products and versions are as follows: FAST/TOOLS (Packages: RVSVRN, UNSVRN, HMIWEB, FTEES, HMIMOB) R9.01 to R10.04
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Yokogawa FAST/TOOLS web application (versions R9.01-R10.04 across packages RVSVRN, UNSVRN, HMIWEB, FTEES, HMIMOB). The application lacks proper origin validation on state-changing requests, allowing attackers to trick authenticated users into unknowingly executing unwanted actions via malicious links.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= r9.01, <= r10.04CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed FAST/TOOLS versionLocate the FAST/TOOLS installation and check the version information, typically found in the software release documentation, About dialog in the web interface, or version files within the installation directory. Consult Yokogawa documentation for version location specifics.Affected if The installed version is R9.01, R9.02, R9.03, R9.04, R10.01, R10.02, R10.03, or R10.04 (any version from R9.01 through R10.04 inclusive)
-
Confirm affected package is deployedIdentify which FAST/TOOLS packages are installed: RVSVRN (Redundant Virtual Station), UNSVRN (Unified Virtual Station), HMIWEB (Web HMI), FTEES (Flexible TEES), or HMIMOB (Mobile HMI). Check installation manifests or deployed components.Affected if Any of these packages (RVSVRN, UNSVRN, HMIWEB, FTEES, HMIMOB) are installed and the version falls within R9.01-R10.04
-
Verify web interface is accessibleDetermine if the FAST/TOOLS web interface is exposed by checking if the web server component is running and accessible on the expected port (typically ports 80/443 or custom ports configured during installation). Check web server status and network listeners.Affected if The web application is accessible remotely or to untrusted networks; CSRF requires the user to access the application via a browser
-
Inspect state-changing endpoints for origin validationReview the web application configuration and HTTP response headers for state-changing operations (POST, PUT, DELETE requests). Check if the application validates Origin or Referer headers on these requests. Use browser developer tools or HTTP proxy to inspect requests.Affected if The application does NOT validate Origin or Referer headers on state-changing requests, meaning requests from arbitrary origins are accepted
You are affected if FAST/TOOLS version is between R9.01 and R10.04 inclusive AND the web interface is accessible AND the application lacks origin validation on state-changing operations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens on all state-changing operations and validate Origin/Referer headers. Apply SameSite=Strict/Lax cookie attributes. Contact Yokogawa for official patches. Consider implementing SameSite cookie attributes as an immediate defense-in-depth measure.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-66595 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-66595 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data