CVE-2025-67261
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAbacre Retail Point of Sale 14.0.0.396 is vulnerable to content-based blind SQL injection. The vulnerability exists in the Search function of the Orders page.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAbacre Retail Point of Sale 14.0.0.396 contains a content-based blind SQL injection vulnerability in the Search function of the Orders page. Attackers can inject malicious SQL queries through unsanitized input in the search parameter, allowing them to infer database contents by observing differences in application responses.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 14.0.0.396CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Abacre Retail Point of Sale versionLocate the installed Abacre Retail Point of Sale application and check its version number. This is typically found in the application's About dialog, installation directory, or Windows Programs and Features. The exact file to check may vary by installation method but is often visible within the application interface or its program metadata.Affected if The installed version is exactly 14.0.0.396
-
Confirm Orders page accessNavigate to the Orders page within the Abacre Retail Point of Sale application. Verify that the Orders functionality is present and accessible in the installed version.Affected if The Orders page and its search function are present and accessible in the application
-
Check search parameter handlingExamine how the search parameter on the Orders page processes user input. In a vulnerable configuration, unsanitized user input in the search field would be passed directly to database queries.Affected if The search parameter accepts user input without sanitization or parameterized query implementation (code review or configuration audit would reveal this)
-
Identify database query implementationReview the application's source code or configuration files related to the Orders search function to determine if dynamic SQL queries are used instead of prepared statements or parameterized queries.Affected if Dynamic SQL queries are used in the Orders search function without input sanitization or parameterized query implementation
If the installed version is exactly 14.0.0.396 and the Orders search function is accessible, the environment is likely affected by this blind SQL injection vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries or prepared statements in the Orders search function, and apply input validation to sanitize all user-supplied search parameters before database execution.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-67261 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-67261 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data