CVE-2025-67278
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue in TIM Solution GmbH TIM BPM Suite & TIM FLOW before v.9.1.2 allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via a crafted HTTP request
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a privilege escalation vulnerability in TIM Solution GmbH TIM BPM Suite and TIM FLOW affecting versions before v.9.1.2. A remote attacker can exploit the issue via a crafted HTTP request to gain elevated privileges beyond their assigned role or permissions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 9.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm TIM Flow installationLocate TIM Flow application files or check for running processes named 'timflow', 'tim-bpm', or associated services. Check common installation directories or use system inventory tools.Affected if TIM Flow software is found running or installed on the system
-
Identify installed versionCheck the application version information typically found in: installation logs, about/help panel in the web interface, version file in the installation directory, or manifest/config files. Compare against the affected range.Affected if Installed version is lower than 9.1.2
-
Verify web interface accessibilityCheck if the TIM Flow web application is exposed by testing HTTP/HTTPS access to the application's authentication endpoints. Review web server configuration files or reverse proxy settings.Affected if The web interface is accessible from network locations beyond trusted administration zones
-
Review HTTP access logsExamine web server and application logs for unusual or crafted HTTP requests, particularly those targeting authentication or authorization endpoints, unusual parameter patterns, or requests attempting to bypass role checks.Affected if Suspicious HTTP requests are observed in logs, especially those involving privilege escalation patterns
A user is affected if TIM Flow version is below 9.1.2 and the web interface is network-accessible, allowing potential exploitation via crafted HTTP requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.1.2
Upgrade TIM BPM Suite and TIM FLOW to version 9.1.2 or later. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the application and monitor for suspicious HTTP requests targeting authentication or authorization endpoints.
9.1.2
- Upgrade TIM Flow to version 9.1.2 or later to resolve the privilege escalation vulnerability.
- Verify the upgrade in the product admin interface to confirm the version number reflects the fix.
- Test that the HTTP endpoint previously vulnerable to privilege escalation now properly enforces authorization checks.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-67278 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-67278 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data