CVE-2025-6741
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper access control in secure message component in Devolutions Server allows an authenticated user to steal unauthorized entries via the secure message entry attachment feature This issue affects the following versions : * Devolutions Server 2025.2.2.0 through 2025.2.4.0 * Devolutions Server 2025.1.11.0 and earlier
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceImproper access control in Devolutions Server's secure message component allows authenticated users to access unauthorized entries through the secure message entry attachment feature, enabling unauthorized data exfiltration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2025.1.11.0>= 2025.2.2.0, < 2025.2.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Devolutions Server installation versionLocate the installed version through the server admin console, registry, or installation logs. In the administration interface, navigate to 'About' or 'System Information' to find the exact version number.Affected if The installed version is <= 2025.1.11.0 OR (>= 2025.2.2.0 AND < 2025.2.5.0)
-
Verify secure message component is activeCheck if the secure message feature is enabled in the Devolutions Server configuration. Navigate to the modules or features settings in the admin panel and confirm whether the secure messaging capability is turned on.Affected if The secure message feature is enabled and accessible to users
-
Review secure message entry attachment permissionsInspect the access control settings for the secure message module. Check the user role permissions specifically related to creating, viewing, and attaching entries to secure messages. Look for any entry attachment or data access permissions assigned to user roles.Affected if Authenticated users have roles that grant access to the secure message entry attachment feature without proper row-level or entry-level access controls
-
Audit user access to secure message entriesExamine the user assignments and access rights for existing secure message entries. Use the administrative reporting tools or database queries to identify which authenticated users can access secure message records that they should not have permission to view.Affected if Any authenticated user can access secure message entries or attachments outside their authorized scope
You are affected if Devolutions Server is installed with a version in the affected range AND the secure message component with attachment functionality is enabled for users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2025.2.5.0
Update to a patched version of Devolutions Server once released; until then, restrict access to the secure message functionality to trusted users only and monitor for anomalous access patterns.
2025.2.5.0
- Upgrade Devolutions Server to version 2025.2.5.0 or later
- After upgrading, verify that the secure message component properly enforces access controls on entry attachments
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,112.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-6741 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-6741 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data