CVE-2025-67574
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in wpdevart Booking calendar, Appointment Booking System booking-calendar allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Booking calendar, Appointment Booking System: from n/a through <= 3.2.30.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe wpdevart Booking Calendar plugin for WordPress has a missing authorization vulnerability (CWE-862) that allows attackers to access functionality they shouldn't be able to access due to incorrectly configured access control security levels. The vulnerability affects versions up to and including 3.2.30, and can be exploited without any authentication privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify wpdevart Booking Calendar plugin is installedCheck your WordPress plugins directory (wp-content/plugins/) for a folder named 'booking-calendar' or search for 'wpdevart' in the plugins list via WordPress admin under Plugins > Installed PluginsAffected if The plugin appears in your WordPress installation's plugin list
-
Identify the installed plugin versionOpen the plugin's main PHP file (usually wp-content/plugins/booking-calendar/wpdevart_booking.php) and look for a version comment or check the plugin's readme.txt file for the 'Stable tag' versionAffected if The version listed is 3.2.30 or lower (any version up to and including 3.2.30)
-
Confirm the plugin is activeIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and verify the wpdevart Booking Calendar status shows as 'Active'Affected if The plugin is enabled and running on your WordPress site
-
Test for unauthenticated access to plugin endpointsSend a direct request to common plugin AJAX handlers (such as /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=booking_calendar...) without providing any authentication cookies or credentials; inspect whether the server returns meaningful data or performs actions instead of rejecting the request with an authorization errorAffected if The plugin processes requests and returns data without requiring login (HTTP 200 response with calendar data or booking operations instead of a login redirect or auth error)
-
Review plugin user capability settingsCheck the plugin settings under Booking Calendar > Settings > General to see if 'User role for using the plugin' is set to 'Everyone' or a role that unauthenticated visitors would have, or inspect the plugin's PHP code for missing current_user_can() checks before sensitive operationsAffected if The plugin allows unauthenticated users to access booking management features or the capability requirement is set too loosely
You are affected if the wpdevart Booking Calendar plugin versions 3.2.30 or lower is installed and active on your WordPress site, and its functionality is accessible without any user login or authorization checks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authorization checks on all sensitive operations and endpoints within the booking calendar system. Update to a patched version if available, or add role-based access control (RBAC) checks to verify user permissions before executing privileged actions.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-67574 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-67574 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data