Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2025-67579

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-12-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing Authorization vulnerability in vanquish User Extra Fields wp-user-extra-fields allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects User Extra Fields: from n/a through <= 16.8.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Missing Authorization vulnerability in the WordPress plugin 'wp-user-extra-fields' (versions <= 16.8) allows unauthenticated or lower-privileged users to access functionality intended for higher-privilege users due to incorrectly configured access control security levels. The plugin fails to properly validate user permissions before allowing access to sensitive user extra field operations.

MitigationImplement proper authorization checks (using WordPress capability checks like 'manage_options' or role verification) on all sensitive plugin functions and AJAX endpoints. Restrict access to user extra field management features to administrators only.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm plugin installation and version
    Navigate to WordPress Admin > Plugins and locate 'wp-user-extra-fields' in the installed plugins list. Note the version number displayed. Alternatively, inspect the plugin's main PHP file (wp-user-extra-fields.php) and search for a version definition (e.g., 'Version: X.X.X').
    Affected if The installed version is 16.8 or lower.
  2. Identify plugin AJAX endpoints
    Inspect the plugin's main PHP file and search for 'add_action' calls registering AJAX actions (look for 'wp_ajax_' and 'wp_ajax_nopriv_' hooks). Record the action names associated with user extra field operations.
    Affected if AJAX endpoints exist that are registered with 'wp_ajax_nopriv_' (allowing unauthenticated access) or lack capability checks within their handler functions.
  3. Review AJAX handler authorization logic
    In the plugin PHP files, locate the callback functions for the identified AJAX actions. Examine each handler for WordPress capability checks (e.g., 'current_user_can()', 'check_ajax_referer()', or role verification like 'administrator' role).
    Affected if The AJAX handlers perform no capability checks, or the checks allow access to subscribers, editors, or other non-administrator roles.
  4. Test unauthenticated access to sensitive features
    Using a browser or HTTP tool (like curl), attempt to access the plugin's AJAX endpoints directly without authenticating or with a low-privilege account (subscriber role). Send a request to wp-admin/admin-ajax.php with the identified action parameters.
    Affected if The requests execute successfully and return sensitive data or perform actions (like creating/modifying user extra fields) without returning a permission denied error.

If the plugin version is 16.8 or lower AND its AJAX endpoints or sensitive functions can be accessed without proper WordPress capability verification, the environment is affected by this authorization bypass.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper authorization checks (using WordPress capability checks like 'manage_options' or role verification) on all sensitive plugin functions and AJAX endpoints. Restrict access to user extra field management features to administrators only.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
19.0 hours of engineering $3,380
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-67579 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-67579 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data