CVE-2025-67584
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in rtCamp GoDAM godam allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects GoDAM: from n/a through <= 1.4.6.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMissing authorization vulnerability in rtCamp GoDAM plugin allows attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels. The plugin fails to properly enforce authorization checks, enabling unauthenticated or unauthorized users to access functionality they should not have permission to use.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm GoDAM plugin is installedCheck the WordPress plugins directory or admin panel for the rtCamp GoDAM plugin. Look for files in /wp-content/plugins/ directory containing 'godam' or 'rtcamp' in the name.Affected if The GoDAM plugin by rtCamp is present in the WordPress installation
-
Identify the installed versionRead the plugin main file (usually godam.php or similar) in /wp-content/plugins/godam/ to find the version declared in the plugin header comment.Affected if The installed version matches or falls within the affected version range (if known)
-
Inspect access control configurationExamine the plugin settings in WordPress admin under GoDAM settings. Look for any security level, permission, or access control settings that can be configured by administrators.Affected if The plugin exposes configurable access control security levels that can be set to insecure values
-
Test authorization enforcement on sensitive endpointsUse a tool like curl or Burp Suite to send requests to GoDAM plugin endpoints (such as ajax actions, API routes, or admin pages) without proper authentication tokens. Compare the response to authenticated requests.Affected if Unauthenticated or unauthorized requests succeed in accessing functionality that should require higher privileges
-
Review user role capability mappingsInspect the plugin code for add_cap, role capability definitions, or map_meta_cap filters to understand what roles can perform what actions. Check if sensitive operations lack proper capability checks.Affected if The plugin allows operations without verifying user capabilities or allows low-privilege users to perform administrative actions
A user is affected if the GoDAM plugin is installed and its access control security levels are misconfigured or missing proper authorization checks, allowing unauthorized access to restricted functionality.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper role-based access control (RBAC) checks and validate user permissions before executing sensitive operations in the GoDAM plugin.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-67584 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-67584 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data