CVE-2025-67603
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Improper Authorization vulnerability in Foomuuri llows arbitrary users to influence the firewall configuration.This issue affects Foomuuri: from ? before 0.31.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceFoomuuri is an nftables-based firewall management tool for Linux. This improper authorization vulnerability allows arbitrary or unauthorized users to influence/modify the firewall configuration. An attacker could potentially change firewall rules, expose services, or disable protection mechanisms.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Foomuuri is installedCheck for the foomuuri binary or package on the system. On most systems, run: which foomuuri or rpm -qa | grep -i foomuuri or dpkg -l | grep -i foomuuriAffected if Foomuuri is not found on the system, then the vulnerability does not apply
-
Determine installed Foomuuri versionRun foomuuri --version or foomuuri -V to retrieve the installed version numberAffected if The command fails or returns no version information, making it impossible to compare against the affected range
-
Compare version against affected rangeTake the version number from the previous step and compare it to version 0.31. Versions before 0.31 are affected by this improper authorization vulnerabilityAffected if The installed version is lower than 0.31 (for example, 0.30, 0.29, etc.)
-
Audit recent firewall configuration changesReview nftables ruleset and Foomuuri configuration files in /etc/foomuuri/ for any unauthorized or unexpected rule modifications. Check logs for firewall change eventsAffected if Unexpected or unauthorized firewall rules are present that were not intentionally configured by the administrator
A system is affected if Foomuuri is installed with a version lower than 0.31, as those versions contain the improper authorization flaw that allows unauthorized firewall modifications.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Foomuuri to version 0.31 or later which contains the authorization fix. Verify firewall rules remain intact after upgrade.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,464.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-67603 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-67603 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data