CVE-2025-67622
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in titopandub Evergreen Post Tweeter evergreen-post-tweeter allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Evergreen Post Tweeter: from n/a through <= 1.8.9.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Evergreen Post Tweeter WordPress plugin allows authenticated or unauthenticated attackers to craft malicious requests that result in Stored XSS. The lack of CSRF protection on plugin forms enables attackers to inject persistent malicious scripts that execute when users view affected content.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Evergreen Post Tweeter is installedIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and locate Evergreen Post Tweeter. Note whether it is active.Affected if The plugin is installed and active in WordPress
-
Check installed version against affected releasesNote the version number displayed in the plugins list. Compare this against any officially documented vulnerable version range for CVE-2025-67622.Affected if Installed version falls within the vulnerable version range or remains unpatched
-
Inspect plugin forms for CSRF token presenceNavigate to the plugin settings page in the WordPress admin. View the page source or use browser developer tools to inspect form HTML. Look for a nonce field such as _wpnonce or similar anti-CSRF token.Affected if Plugin forms do not contain any nonce or CSRF protection token field
-
Test for stored XSS via form submissionSubmit a test payload containing script tags (for example, <script>alert(1)</script>) through the plugin forms. Save the settings and view the resulting page to see if the payload executes.Affected if Submitted content is stored and rendered without sanitization, allowing the script to execute in a browser
User is affected if the plugin is installed, the version is within the vulnerable range, and the plugin forms lack CSRF protection enabling stored XSS injection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens (nonces) on all plugin forms and AJAX actions, and ensure proper input validation and output escaping to prevent XSS. Users should update to a patched version once available.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,848.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-67622 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-67622 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data