CVE-2025-67787
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in 25.1.2 before 25.1.5. A Cross Site Scripting (XSS) issue in DriveLock Operations Center allows for session takeover over a network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA stored or reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in DriveLock Operations Center versions 25.1.2 through 25.1.4 allows attackers to inject malicious scripts that can lead to session takeover when executed in the context of another user's session.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 25.1.2= 25.1.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify DriveLock Operations Center versionAccess the Operations Center web interface and navigate to the About or System Information section, typically found under Help or Settings menus. Alternatively, check the installed software list on the system where DriveLock Operations Center is deployed.Affected if The displayed version number falls within the range 25.1.2 to 25.1.4 inclusive
-
Confirm web interface is activeVerify that the DriveLock Operations Center web interface is accessible by attempting to reach the URL (commonly https://hostname:port or http://hostname:port where Operations Center is hosted). Check if login page or dashboard loads.Affected if The web interface is accessible and responds to HTTP requests, as the XSS vulnerability exists within this web component
-
Check for recent authentication activityReview web server access logs or DriveLock audit logs for any suspicious script injection patterns, such as <script>, javascript:, or other HTML tags containing event handlers (onload, onerror, onclick) in request parameters.Affected if Unusual or malicious script patterns are found in logs associated with Operations Center endpoints
A user is affected if DriveLock Operations Center is running version 25.1.2, 25.1.3, or 25.1.4 and the web interface is accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate DriveLock Operations Center to version 25.1.5 or later to remediate the vulnerability.
25.1.5
- Backup current DriveLock installation and configuration data
- Download DriveLock version 25.1.5 from the official vendor source (drivelock.help)
- Stop the DriveLock services
- Install DriveLock version 25.1.5 following standard upgrade procedures
- Restart DriveLock services
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version number
- Test that the XSS vulnerability in DriveLock Operations Center is no longer present
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,392.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-67787 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-67787 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data