Improper Access ControlWeakness · CWE-284

CVE-2025-67796

HIGH · 8.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-04
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
87/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IKUS Rdiffweb before 2.10.5 has an improper authorization flaw that allows an attacker with any valid or stolen access token to act as other users. The API does not enforce binding between the authenticated subject and the targeted user/tenant, so crafted requests can read or modify other users data and, in some cases, perform privileged actions. This issue may enable cross-tenant access. Fixed in version 2.10.6.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

IKUS Rdiffweb before 2.10.5 contains an improper authorization vulnerability where the API fails to enforce binding between the authenticated subject and the targeted user/tenant. An attacker with any valid access token can read or modify other users' data and potentially perform cross-tenant attacks by crafting requests that target resources belonging to other users.

MitigationUpgrade to Rdiffweb version 2.10.6 or later to obtain the fixed API authorization logic that enforces user/tenant binding.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Rdiffweb version
    Run 'rdiffweb --version' or check the web interface footer/summary page for the version number, or inspect the installed package (e.g., pip show rdiffweb, docker image tag, or rpm/deb package version)
    Affected if The version is lower than 2.10.5 (e.g., 2.10.4, 2.10.3, 2.9.x, etc.)
  2. Confirm API module is enabled
    Check the Rdiffweb configuration file (typically /etc/rdiffweb/rdiffweb.conf or ~/rdiffweb.conf) for API-related settings such as 'api_enabled', 'api_token_auth', or inspect if the /api/ endpoints are accessible on the server
    Affected if The API feature is enabled and accessible on the instance
  3. Verify API token-based authentication is configured
    Check if API tokens have been generated and are active. Look for 'api_token' entries in the configuration or database, or check the web interface under API settings or user profile pages for active tokens
    Affected if Any valid API tokens exist in the system
  4. Inspect API access logs for cross-user requests
    Review Rdiffweb logs (typically in /var/log/rdiffweb/ or accessible via the web interface) for API calls where the authenticated user differs from the target user/tenant identifier in the request path or parameters
    Affected if Logs show API requests accessing data belonging to users/tenants other than the token holder
  5. Check user and tenant configuration
    Examine the Rdiffweb admin interface or user database to identify if multiple users or tenants (repositories with different owners) are configured in the system
    Affected if Multiple users or tenants exist in the environment

If the installed Rdiffweb version is below 2.10.5 and the API is enabled with active tokens in a multi-user or multi-tenant environment, the vulnerability is present and exploitable.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to Rdiffweb version 2.10.6 or later to obtain the fixed API authorization logic that enforces user/tenant binding.

Recommended fix High confidence

2.10.6

  1. Upgrade IKUS Rdiffweb to version 2.10.6 or later

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
25.0 hours of engineering $4,400
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-67796 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-67796 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data