CVE-2025-67853
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in Moodle. A remote attacker could exploit a lack of proper rate limiting in the confirmation email service. This vulnerability allows attackers to more easily enumerate or guess user credentials, facilitating brute-force attacks against user accounts.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMoodle's confirmation email service lacks proper rate limiting, allowing remote attackers to repeatedly submit email addresses to determine which ones are registered in the system. This user enumeration enables credential guessing and facilitates brute-force attacks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 4.1.22>= 4.4.0, < 4.4.11>= 4.5.0, < 4.5.8>= 5.0.0, < 5.0.4= 5.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Moodle versionAccess the admin interface, navigate to Site Administration > Server > Environment, or check the version.php file in the Moodle root directory (look for $version or $release variables)Affected if The installed version falls in any of these ranges: < 4.1.22, >= 4.4.0 and < 4.4.11, >= 4.5.0 and < 4.5.8, >= 5.0.0 and < 4.0.4, or equals 5.1.0
-
Verify email self-registration is enabledGo to Site Administration > Plugins > Authentication > Manage Authentication, and check if 'Email-based self-registration' (or similar self-registration option) is set to enabledAffected if Email self-registration is enabled and the installed version is vulnerable (see step 1)
-
Confirm the confirmation email endpoint is exposedAttempt to access the password reset or new account confirmation endpoint (typically /login/forgot_password.php or /login/signup.php) without authentication, or check if these scripts are accessible to unauthenticated usersAffected if Unauthenticated users can access the email confirmation or password reset form, and the installed version is vulnerable
-
Check for rate limiting on email endpointsReview web server (Apache/Nginx) configuration or Moodle settings for rate limiting rules on /login/forgot_password.php, /login/signup.php, or adjacent endpoints. Also check if any WAF or traffic management tool is applying rate limits to these pathsAffected if No rate limiting, CAPTCHA, or account lockout mechanism is configured for the email confirmation endpoint, and the installed version is vulnerable
A user is affected if their Moodle version is in the affected ranges AND email self-registration or password reset is enabled with no rate limiting on the confirmation endpoint.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.1.224.4.114.5.8
Implement rate limiting on the email confirmation endpoint to restrict the number of requests from a single source within a time window, potentially combined with CAPTCHA or account lockout policies.
Moodle 4.1.22, 4.4.11, 4.5.8, or 5.0.4 (depending on your current branch)
- 1. Back up your Moodle database and entire Moodle directory (codebase, moodledata, and any custom plugins)
- 2. Identify your current Moodle version branch (4.1.x, 4.4.x, 4.5.x, or 5.0.x)
- 3. Download the corresponding fixed version: 4.1.22 for 4.1.x, 4.4.11 for 4.4.x, 4.5.8 for 4.5.x, or 5.0.4 for 5.0.x from moodle.org
- 4. Replace the Moodle codebase with the new version files
- 5. Run the Moodle upgrade script via CLI (php admin/cli/upgrade.php) or through the web interface
- 6. Clear all Moodle caches (php admin/cli/purge_caches.php)
- 7. Verify the rate limiting is now properly enforced on the user confirmation email functionality
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-67853 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-67853 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data