Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2025-67917

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-01-08
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing Authorization vulnerability in shinetheme Traveler traveler allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Traveler: from n/a through <= 3.2.6.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Missing Authorization vulnerability in the Traveler theme allows attackers to access functionality that should be protected by proper access controls. The issue stems from incorrectly configured access control security levels, likely meaning certain administrative or privileged functions lack proper authentication/authorization checks before execution.

MitigationImplement proper authorization checks (e.g., capability verification, role-based access control) on all sensitive functions and endpoints within the Traveler theme, ensuring unauthenticated or unauthorized users cannot access privileged functionality.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Traveler theme installation and version
    Locate the Traveler theme directory (typically wp-content/themes/traveler or similar) and check the style.css file header for the 'Version:' field. Alternatively, check via WordPress admin dashboard under Appearance > Themes.
    Affected if The installed version cannot be determined or is within an affected version range (if known from external advisory).
  2. Identify theme AJAX endpoints and admin functions
    Search theme PHP files for add_action('wp_ajax_...) calls and any functions handling administrative tasks, settings updates, or privileged operations. Look for files in includes/, functions/, or similar directories.
    Affected if The theme contains AJAX handlers or admin functions that do not include capability checks (e.g., current_user_can('manage_options') or similar) before executing sensitive operations.
  3. Verify authorization on sensitive theme functions
    Examine the identified privileged functions for proper WordPress capability checks. Search for 'current_user_can', 'wp_verify_nonce', or role-based checks within those functions. Check both frontend and backend handlers.
    Affected if Sensitive functions (user data handling, settings modification, content manipulation) execute without verifying user authentication or authorization first.
  4. Check for exposed configuration or submission endpoints
    Inspect theme files for form handlers, settings APIs, or callback functions that process user input. Verify these include nonce verification and capability checks before processing.
    Affected if The theme accepts and processes requests from unauthenticated users or users lacking proper privileges for the requested action.

A user is affected if the Traveler theme is installed and any privileged functions, AJAX endpoints, or administrative handlers lack proper capability or authentication checks before execution.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper authorization checks (e.g., capability verification, role-based access control) on all sensitive functions and endpoints within the Traveler theme, ensuring unauthenticated or unauthorized users cannot access privileged functionality.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-67917 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-67917 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data